Search Maine Yellow Pages 
Log In | Register | Help
Morning Sentinel
Abortion bill lessens financial discrimination
Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel Friday, May 11, 2007

I am writing to urge support for L.D. 1309, an act to provide equity in women's health services.

I have never understood why MaineCare pays for multiple prenatal visits and hospital delivery costs for poor women, who ultimately stay "in the system" supported by taxpayers even longer due to the financial burden of having yet another child, yet MaineCare does not cover the one-time cost of an abortion.

The women who are most adversely affected by an unwanted pregnancy are Maine's poorest women, who are on MaineCare.

Women with private health insurance don't have to deal with the cost of an abortion if they need one. But for Maine's poorest women, coming up with hundreds of dollars on short notice puts them in a position to delay paying for other bills like rent or groceries, asking for help from an unsupportive partner, or delaying the abortion until they are further along in the pregnancy, when risks and cost increase. Even worse, they may continue an unwanted pregnancy that they feel they are unable to care for, neglecting their own health while pregnant and making them a less-than-ideal candidate for making an adoption plan.

Without L.D. 1309, the right to choose an abortion is denied to certain women for financial reasons. L.D. 1309 lessens discrimination against low-income women, and makes fiscal and ethical sense.

Nicole Mathieu

Hallowell


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

Dilli Gaf of Schenectady, NY
May 11, 2007 1:17 PM
I was under the impression that if one didn't want to shoot themselves, don't look down the barrel of the gun. Allow me to rephrase, don't want to get pregnant, don't screw around.

Medicaid works like this, the Federal government will reimburse the State for proper medical claims under a policy that has been created. Abortion is not under any policy, so therefore it would not be reimbursed. The State must pay for the medical treatment, out of the State's general fund.

It seems funny to me that if your State has trouble balancing it's budget now (and every one is saying the State is spending too much), why would you add more spending measures on something that only benefits less than 8% of the population.

Stupid is as stupid does.

Oh, by the way, vaginal intercourse is not the only way to have sex. I can thing of at least 2 other orifices’.
report abuse
AJ of Rome, ME
May 11, 2007 12:52 PM
You got it Greg.

Oldguy, how about this logic?

Without (some dumb law) the right to smoke cigarettes is denied to certain people for financial reasons. (Some dumb law) lessens discrimination against low-income people and makes fiscal and ethical sense.

Since we don't have a problem with a (wo)man doing as s/he sees fit, we should have no problem allowing, say Food Stamps to be used to buy cigarettes. You may choose NOT to smoke cigarettes just as you may choose NOT to have sex and get pregnant. Or if you DO choose to have sex, you take proper precautions.

Lastly,
"If this truly is a problem and the cost isn't great it makes sense to do this instead of paying welfare benefits for children for the next 18 years."
This is exactly the logic that has gotten our society to the point where it is today that we NEED to be having this debate in the first place. Cheaper to pay for an abortion than pay welfare for the next 18 years. We CREATED the "Great Society" and now we have to live with it. Maybe... JUST MAYBE if we had more RESPONSIBILITIES and fewer RIGHTS, we'd not be in this mess.....report abuse
Greg of Skowhegan, ME
May 11, 2007 10:44 AM
This crowd is always advocating abortion as birth control. By their logic the public must also pay for vasectomies for men, condoms, Viagra, and penile implants. There's no end to it!
Any individual "rights" should end at the point where it is the responsibility of someone else to pay for it!report abuse
Didi of Somewhere In, ME
May 11, 2007 10:27 AM
Ms. Mathieu, the solution to your problem is simple and requires NO action on the legislature's part. First, if you dont "want the financial burden of having yet another child" then DON'T GET PREGNANT! There are plenty of ways Maine Care will pay for you to avoid becoming pregnant in the first place. Second, if you feel so "discriminated against" because you are low-income, then YOU need to take action (education, training, whatever it takes!) to get yourself a JOB if you don't have one, or a BETTER job if you do. If you are able bodied, then there is NO reason why you should be on Maine Care. You need to STOP cyring "discrimination" and do something about your situation ON YOUR OWN.report abuse

Show all 8 comments

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.


MaineBusiness.com: Maine News Direct  Business Classifieds  Blogs
Arts & Entertainment: Calendar   Movies   Music   Dining
Travel: Maine Regions   Things to Do   Maine Guide   From Away   Vacation Rentals   Lodging Guide   Campgrounds
Outdoors: Biking   Fishing   Hiking   Hunting   Nature Watching   Outdoors with Children   Paddling
Other sections: myMaineToday   Seen   Blogs   Pets   Kids & Family
Classifieds: MaineJobs   Real Estate   Wheels   Marketplace   Celebrations   Place an ad
Portland Press Herald/Maine Sunday Telegram: News   Sports   Business   Editorials   Nemitz   iHerald   Obituaries   Special Reports   Reader Services
Subscriber Rewards Club  
Kennebec Journal: News   Sports   Obituaries   Opinion   Reader Services
Morning Sentinel: News   Sports   Obituaries   Opinion   Reader Services
Advertising: Advertising products   Audience   Content areas   Service   Contact us
Questions/Comments?
Copyright © 2009, MaineToday Media, Inc.