Morning Sentinel
The unraveling of
Maine school consolidation
George Smith Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel 11/21/2007

It seemed like a good idea at the time. We were almost unanimous in our understanding that Maine was spending too much on school administration. We agreed that this problem ought to be fixed. We were unified and ready to act.

So how did things go so wrong?

The answer is simple. We made it too complex. We made it too costly. We made it too fast. We mandated it. And we failed to get key constituencies on board.

Today, school consolidation is threatened by a citizen initiative to repeal it, legislative bills to scale it back, and the upcoming votes of Mainers who are likely to reject their new school districts.

Let's go back to the beginning and remind ourselves of what it was we agreed upon. Believe it or not, just a year ago it appeared that we could get this done with little pain and no agony.

The Brookings Institution's "Plan for Sustainable Prosperity and Quality Places," created for GrowSmart Maine, set our course with the following three very sensible recommendations:

n Reduce K-12 administrative expenditures to the vicinity of the national average of $195 per pupil, and save about $25 million.

n Fully pay for and enlarge the Fund for the Efficient Delivery of Education Services to promote voluntary collaborations between schools and districts to reduce K-12 costs.

n Appoint a high-level school district reorganization committee to substantially reduce the number of school administrative units.

This would have given us a thoughtful, collaborative, voluntary process to wring inefficiencies out of our school administrative structure and systems and encourage collaborations to reduce costs -- just the opposite of the chaotic, mandatory and hasty consolidation we're now suffering.

Perhaps most aggravating, this consolidation is likely to end up costing us more money, not less. Curriculums will have to be merged, with lots of new books and other material and teacher training. Teacher contracts will go up to the level of the highest contracts in the new districts. More principals will be hired. And the state's cuts in school aid in areas like transportation will shift more of the burden to the property tax.

Actually, it will be our property taxes that skyrocket because of this convoluted, poorly planned consolidation. Believe it or not, the state has already booked the savings on its side of the ledger!

Brookings clearly spelled out the problem, reporting, "Maine's schools and school districts employ an unusually large number of administrators and other non-instructional staffers whose presence drives up expenditures and suggests inefficiency. Maine's K-12 system employs, for example, one administrator for every 127 students, much higher than the average ratio of one to 212 and the nation's fourth-highest rate of administration." Likewise, Maine taxpayers support one school or district administrator for every 11.1 teachers -- the country's ninth highest number of administrators per teacher.

"Maine could realize between $10 million and $35 million in annual K-12 education-costs savings without closing or consolidating a single school by reducing administration costs to various national or Maine-consolidated-district standards," concluded Brookings.

The savings could be achieved without consolidation! And collaborative efforts between schools and districts could help reduce costs too -- without consolidation!

We're being force fed an unpleasant stew and it may be time to up chuck it all and start over.

The handwriting is certainly on the wall for my small town of Mount Vernon. On the huge new consolidated district school board, we'll be lucky to get one seat. There is no question that this mandatory consolidation scheme punishes rural Maine, just like the new state school funding formula does.

You remember rural Maine. It's where people used to live and work, where kids got good educations in small schools, where life was lived the way it should be.

Isn't it time to recognize that Maine has some great teachers? We ought to get out of their way and let them teach. Maine has the highest ratio of "other" payroll to instructional payroll, with $2.13 going to non-instructional payroll for every $1 going to instructional payroll. Don't blame teachers for this costly mess.

Public meetings are being held now to explain all of this to you. Please make a real effort to attend those meetings.

It's critical that you know all the impacts of consolidation -- because you're going to vote on it later. The consolidation plans must be submitted to the Department of Education by Dec. 1, with a response by Dec. 15. A referendum on the each plan must be held in effected communities starting on Jan. 15.

I can't wait to vote. How about you?

George Smith is executive director of the Sportsman's Alliance of Maine. He lives in Mount Vernon and can be reached at george@samcef.org.

Bookmark and share this story: digg del.icio.us Reddit


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest First | Newest first

Jerry Nault of Windsor, ME
Nov 21, 2007 6:48 AM
We're in a fine kettle of fish, are we not?

If we're to follow along with the logic in George's piece, school consolidation is not going to happen. There's been a rush to judgement without putting out even the hint of a reasonably sound solution. Instead, School Administrative Units have been directed to find a way to unite with their neighbors and precious little assistance has been provided by the State of Maine for this sort of coming together. The chances of the people of Maine supporting this mad game of musical chairs is slight.

But, there's only one problem with what's going on. The savings have been booked by the Legislature. The money is gone and will not be seen by the School Administrative Units in the coming year. Regardless if you have a plan or not, you better be able to find the expected savings from other sources, because you're going to get less money from Augusta in the coming year. If it's business as usual at the local level, taxpayers will have to dig deeper into their pockets.

Compounding the Legislature's woes coming in January is that the General Fund will be short by tens of millions of dollars. And, they've not even found the $10-million that was booked, but not cut when the 2008 budget was passed in the last fiscal year.

Yes sir, it's a fine kettle of fish in which we find ourselves. There will be plenty of coal to distribute in people's Christmas stockings!report abuse
Bill Reid of New Sharon, ME
Nov 21, 2007 10:39 AM
The state over reached in this. As I see it, the state simply said to the towns we are not going to spend 5% each for transportation, facilities, and special ed, and 50% for administration, i.e. they are going to cut that much of their share of school support. Consolidate or we'll punish you. If you have to raise local property taxes to make up the differences, tough. The state will take their savings and, no doubt, dump it away on some social scheme. The consolidation law is very complicated and it seems that the DOE was given the charge to get it done, so it has been flying by the seat of its pants, making it up as they go along. The lawyers are going to make out and have been making out pretty well. Our legislature is far too busy, far far too busy. They'll not leave us alone, not stop regulating us, not stop taxing us or fiddling with the taxes to make it appear that we are not being taxed heavily in all ways. Many school districts were cooperating or preparing to cooperate before this law. I have a pretty good knowledge of one of the RSU committee's efforts, and it seems to me that twist or turn, there is little savings to be achieved by this forced consolidation. The state government will, however, get more control over education by making the number of school districts smaller. report abuse
catsome of portland, ME
Nov 21, 2007 11:28 AM
"WE"??? a bit of revsionist history there george. and a bit presumptuous of you. WE unanomously agreed..? "WE" agreed the problem needed to be fixed? "The brooking institute said"....I;d say you are trying to create spin... HELLO WE are NOT the Brookings Institute...It was a very small group of "WE" george. It was the governor!!! A party of ONE.

You seemed to have MISSED the fact that when they took this "show on the road" thruout Maine and then brought the show back home to the augusta civic center,there was NOONE in the rooms that supported the plan Or proposal...AND the rooms were packed to the rafters --except for the legisltiors lining the walls, and staying silent as they heard speaker after speaker get up to oppose the plan from kittey to calais!!!

The governor tried to fast track it and shove it down our throat. Then the appropriations committee tried to do the same. The governor stole the idea and proposal from the MEA and they were agahast when the plan to cut $35 million from the schools was made public. They hadn't bothered to talk to their rank and file and neither did the governor. The MEA stayed mighty and suddenly silent.
The EDUCATION COMMITTEE was left completely out of the loop and used the public out cry opposed to the plan to get themselves BACK into the loop. It was apparrent right from the beginning this wasn't an "education" plan but a "financial" plan. The education committee and educators were left totally OUT of the discsussion.
They showed up in droves. And their input was completely disregarded and labled as "special interest". John Martin threatened to sue/
fire any superintend who dared to show up and speak up for themselves AND sound educational policy!!!
NO George "WE" didn't unanomously support anything. "WE" didn't decide there was a problem needing fixing. IN fact legislature after legislature had REJECTED consolidation for decades. A small group of people decided to KILL democracy FOR us.report abuse
catsome of portland, ME
Nov 21, 2007 12:02 PM
This plan had nothing to do with sound educational policy and everything to do with saving THE STATE money and payback. Now that the state was on the horizon of having to pay their 55% fair share of educational costs--having postponed it for 4 years---they came up with a new way to say NO to the voters demanding they pay their 55% fair share for eduction to bring real property tax relief
They never wanted to be compelled to pay their 55% fair share!! Despite 2 referendas saying they MUST, they defiantly said to the voters "WE WON'T and you can't make us" They said they would do it over 4 year--(the plan the voters REJECTED). Facing the 4th year and having to finally "pay the piper", the governor decided to goo up the works ---ok we'll pay 55%- but it will be 55% of LESS-enter so called "consolidation"...

Hidden deep in that huge bill is the fact that not only are they cutting the pie so it will be 55% of less...but that they are continuing to postpone for several MORE years paying even that 55% of LESS... except for" consolidation" this would have been the year that municipalities and their taxpayers MIGHT have actually seen property tax releif as a result of the NEW school funding formula.
This wasn't about "effeciencies" or consolidation but saving the state money by continuing to postpone their 55% fair share obligation to schools.

It is also an attack on democracy. First you will loose your local school boards and the right to even ELECT a school board. We will APPOINT a regional school board FOR you and WE will decide who will be on it. It won't be anyone YOU know, so you can't influence their decision making, but WE can tell then what to do , we appoint them after all... 2.AND you will "get" to vote on the budget BUT if you vote NO -- we will penalize you by cutting the budget. So you can vote but you can Only vote YES. Death to democracy...not a free will vote. A vote under duress.

Not a well thought out plan!!! report abuse

Show all 8 comments

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.