Thursday, July 12, 2007
from the Kennebec Journal
FAIRPOINT PLAN TARGETS DEBT
Wind project off Mass. meets strong resistance
Three bills seek tougher rules for petitioners
New rules for special education debated
Happy apples
AUGUSTA: Cuts to French curriculum run into opposition
HIGH SCHOOL BOYS BASKETBALL: Hall-Dale drops MVC title game to Mountain Valley
HIGH SCHOOL HOCKEY NOTEBOOK: Different stakes in Gardiner-Winslow rivalry
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Kennebec Journal
from the Morning Sentinel
'At the time ... he was psychotic'
Man answers door, is attacked with Mace and then robbed
FairPoint reorganization plan aims to slash company's debt
Concerns over special-education changes aired
FAIRFIELD: Clinton man, 21, arrested on rape, assault charges
Stun gun, arrest of suspect end high-speed, 2-town chase
HIGH SCHOOL HOCKEY NOTEBOOK: Gardiner, Winslow take to ice again
GIRLS BASKETBALL: Skowhegan wins KVAC A title game
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Morning Sentinel
After 10 years of work by Lee to bring the proposal to fruition, commissioners found themselves unable to sanction construction of huge turbines in the sensitive alpine habitat, long cherished by naturalists as well as hikers on the adjacent Appalachian Trail. This, despite the fact that the commission's own staff had recommended approval of the project.
It was a blow, as well, to those who believe that the ecological perils of global climate change outweigh the ecological impact of turbine and road construction on the mountains.
We joined with those who protested the decision as shortsighted and, to a degree, sentimental. The critical challenge to produce non-carbon polluting energy means that we need to take a hardheaded look at the tradeoffs when projects like these are proposed. What was once unacceptable in the era before climate change may now require us to adjust our standards. That's the nature of compromise in the face of threat.
A compromise emerged this Monday.
That's when developer Lee and a host of environmental, public health and clean energy groups announced that the wind-power developer had agreed to scale back the project to just Black Nubble Mountain, which is farther away from the Appalachian Trail than Redington.
The new proposal to the commission is for construction of 18 turbines, versus the original 30; they'll produce power for the equivalent of 21,545 Maine homes annually instead of the original 44,300. And if the state permits construction of that substantially smaller project with less environmental impact, then Lee will permanently restrict wind-power development on Redington Pond Range, which is the last undeveloped and unprotected 4,000 foot peak in Maine.
The application to the commission states that, "on balance, the Black Nubble Wind Farm will result in long-term benefits and does not cause undue adverse impacts to the jurisdiction." At the same time, developers claim that "the environmental benefits from this project, which include cleaner air, reduced emissions of greenhouse gases that cause global warming ... outweigh the limited adverse impacts of the Black Nubble Wind Farm."
There are some environmental groups in opposition to even this new plan, but many more have appropriately jumped on board with Lee. We supported the plan the first time around when it included Redington Pond Range. Now, by coupling a promise of protection for Redington with a scaled-back project, we hope Lee can similarly convince the commission of the project's undeniable merits.




Reader comments
Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First
your generalizations are way off base.
I am an avid hiker who is VERY concerned about the environment, but I totally support the use of wind-power wherever feasible, including the Black Nubble project.
I am as frustrated as you are by those who insist in a PERFECT world, where they can have everything they want without any trade-offs.
Having seen the tremendous damage being done to our alpine forests by acid rain caused by coal plants, I am willing to look at a wind farm while hiking.
Those concerned about the effects on birds and other species should consider the even more drastic negative effects if we continue to rely on fossil fuels.
Conservation is to be commended, but we need to get out energy from somewhere. I favor the maximum use of wind, solar, and hydro power as our best bets to protect the environment in the long run.report abuse
Everyone is srceaming about oil prices, gas prices, pollution ruining the environment and these boneheads turn around and say they dont like wind power because the turbines spoil their view!
Please do us all a favor and go live someplace else! You people are killing this state in many ways!report abuse
You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.