Morning Sentinel
Whose job is it to foster landowner-sportsman ties?
George Smith Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel Wednesday, July 11, 2007

You've never heard of this group but it may hold the key to your recreational future. The Landowner and Sportsmen Relations Advisory Board was created in 2003 by the Legislature, but it took Gov. John Baldacci two full years to appoint its members -- perhaps an indication that this important issue is a low priority in this administration.

Ironically, appointees to this board, including yours truly, received confirmation letters from Baldacci dated May 23, 2005, exactly two years from the day when the governor signed into law the bill that created this board.

As Maine's tradition of public access to, and across, private land continues to evaporate, the importance of maintaining a good relationship between landowners and recreationists is paramount. So far, neither state agencies nor recreationists as a group have been able to foster the type of relationship and programs that will sustain this wonderful tradition of neighborly access.

Without question, the advisory board has struggled to gain any momentum on the key issues of public access to private land. A predecessor group to the current Advisory Board was also ineffective.

The board's outspoken chair, Dave Peppard, expressed his frustration in a June 7 memo to board members, reporting, "Since 2002, the Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Landowner Relations Program has deteriorated to a point of being basically non-existent."

Peppard should know. The retired game warden once headed the Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife's landowner relations program. After he retired, the department downgraded the program to just 10 percent of one warden's time.

Perhaps we have focused too strongly on the government to lead this effort. The Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife has been reluctant to tackle the job of maintaining good relations between landowners and sportsmen.

In fact, this legislative session the department opposed a bill proposed by the Sportsman's Alliance of Maine (for which I work) to create a landowner relations position in the department's Information and Education Division. A bill proposed by the Small Woodland Owners Association of Maine to establish landowner relations as a part of the mission of the Maine Warden Service was also opposed by the department.

An outside professional assessment of the Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife in 2004 offered some explanation of the problems, criticizing the department for "putting a good warden in this (landowner relations) position so he can be a sergeant, instead of filling the position with the right person, warden or not, (which) can lead to program ineffectiveness."

The assessment was performed by the Management Assistance Team of the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, and reported that "the landowner relations position would work well as a direct arm of the Commissioner, more high profile, using a broad range of skills and experience as well as sound comprehension of laws and regulations and law enforcement protocols."

The team's recommendations were the basis for the bills submitted by SAM and the Small Woodland Owners. The department's opposition was disappointing.

The Landowner and Sportsmen Relations Advisory Board could be the solution to this challenge. Peppard said as much, recently challenging his board to "develop a comprehensive landowner relations program that can be presented to the Legislature."

I believe the guiding principles for a landowner relations program should include the following:

n Funding must come from all recreationists.

n The state's program must be consolidated in and directed by one state agency, with all state conservation agencies contributing staff and other resources. Landowner relations should be part of the mission of each conservation agency and especially the Maine Warden Service.

n Services must include information and education (for both landowners and recreationists), enforcement of laws and rules governing users of private land and assistance to landowners who encounter problems or have questions. A free 800 telephone number should be available for landowners with questions or problems. A Web site should be established and maintained with up-to-date and comprehensive information, and television and print ads should be used seasonally.

n Delivery of services must occur primarily at the grassroots through clubs and other organizations (ATV, Snowmobile, Fish and Game), and participating clubs and organizations should receive most of the money collected by the state for this program.

Elements of the program should have measurable results that can be tracked and reported regularly, including landowner complaints to, and responses by, the Maine Warden Service.

Finally, responsibility for creating positive relationships with the private landowners who allow public access to and use of their land must rest with the individuals who benefit. Asking for permission to access and use private land and thanking landowners after you do, are your responsibility and the only guarantee that these opportunities will continue.

George Smith is executive director of the Sportsman's Alliance of Maine. He lives in Mount Vernon and can be reached at george@samcef.org.

Bookmark and share this story: digg del.icio.us Reddit


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest First | Newest first

Bill Randall of Winthrop, ME
Jul 11, 2007 7:34 AM
I've read this column over several times trying to think of something positive and productive to say. When I think of all that has done in the past in regards to landowner relations, I have wonder why Smith continues to harp about this subject. I am now looking at a CD called Landowner Relations that was produced at a cost of $30,000 from the Maine Outdoor Heritage Fund. The research for this costly study was done by former outdoor writer Roberta Scruggs in conjunction with Sportsman's Alliance of Maine. The fact of the matter is that nearly everybody that has been involved with this issue had turned this issue of simplicity into an administrative nightmare. Smith's column proves it. As a landowner, I can assure Smith that I would not want anything whatsoever to do with all of his complicities. We already have a very simple law that was passed in 1973 that allows a trespass without landowner permission. It's called the Great Ponds Act and it is found in Title 17, Section 3860. It is a very clear and simple law that provides for up to 90 days in jail for any landowner who denies the trespass by anyone on foot over his unimproved property to access or egress a great pond excepting a pond that is a water supply. The passage of this law set a record for work sessions (18) at the Maine Legislature. The intent of the law is to allow what Smith claims does not exist - the right of a sportsman to walk across my land to hunt and fish and it matters not whether the land is posted No Trespassing or No Hunting. The two key words in the law are that the land must be "unimproved" and the trespass only allows a trespass "by foot." I encourage sportsmen to carry a copy of this law with him when he is afoot in the Maine woods.report abuse
Bigd of Wayne, ME
Jul 11, 2007 10:00 AM
If Bill said something positive and productive today it would be the first time.report abuse
Cecil Gray of bingham, ME
Jul 11, 2007 10:09 AM
I think the between the lines message George conveys is that his "advisory board" will continue the "tradition" of being "manned" by the same bunch of cronies that are appointed to all of these landowner/want to kill and recreate anywhere I damn well please; confrontations. George is ignoring Mr. Randall's revealing of the law and he is also ignoring the basic American fundamental right of being a landowner who can tell George to take his ATV and deer driving buddies and stick them. WE as sportsmen and women need to seek compromise with prospective landowners who are coming to the North Woods. This will take a truly diverse Advisory Group and one that is very capable of mature discussion and action. If it's half park half recreate then at least we have HALF. If the "tradition" of just knee jerking the old restore boston attitude continues then we are being fools who are simply waiting for the flip of the land owner coin which leads to absolute non control for our voice. Mr. Smith would just as soon buck his hard right stand and rewrite the Constitution for bear baiters and others who think they own it all anyway. It's funny watching this old grizzled hard headed right wing lobby starting to call the landowners the great evil. Leaning to socialism of the woods boys?report abuse
Jim Moore of Brunswick, ME
Jul 11, 2007 11:19 AM
It's downright peculiar.

Those hunters jealously protecting their right to play with deadly weapons while trespassing on everybody else's property have no regard for the rights of those who own the property.

It's the same Me-Me mindset that lets thieves rationalize their self-serving crimes.

Maybe when those hunters show equal consideration for the rights of others, the rest of us might show some sympathy for them. Meanwhile, I couldn't care less about the free convenience of their insignificant pastime and its lack of benefit for anyone except them.
report abuse

Show all 8 comments

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.