Wednesday, July 11, 2007
from the Kennebec Journal
BUDGET CUTS ORDERED
Many happy returns in Richmond
Tax woes land on Whitefield
Rapist denied new trial
AUGUSTA MINDING A MINE
SPORT OF KINGS Falconry a blend of dedication and commitment
COLLEGE HOCKEY: Maine rallies but falls short against Boston College
COLLEGE ROUNDUP: Colby women win season opener at home tournament
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Kennebec Journal
from the Morning Sentinel
WEDDING BURGLAR JAILED
Youths talk Turkey Day
Plenty of free Thanksgiving meals available
Turkey prices make for happier holiday
Kennebec County Superior Court
POLICE
COLLEGE HOCKEY: Maine rallies but falls short against Boston College
COLLEGE ROUNDUP: Colby women win season opener at home tournament
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Morning Sentinel
Ironically, appointees to this board, including yours truly, received confirmation letters from Baldacci dated May 23, 2005, exactly two years from the day when the governor signed into law the bill that created this board.
As Maine's tradition of public access to, and across, private land continues to evaporate, the importance of maintaining a good relationship between landowners and recreationists is paramount. So far, neither state agencies nor recreationists as a group have been able to foster the type of relationship and programs that will sustain this wonderful tradition of neighborly access.
Without question, the advisory board has struggled to gain any momentum on the key issues of public access to private land. A predecessor group to the current Advisory Board was also ineffective.
The board's outspoken chair, Dave Peppard, expressed his frustration in a June 7 memo to board members, reporting, "Since 2002, the Inland Fisheries and Wildlife Landowner Relations Program has deteriorated to a point of being basically non-existent."
Peppard should know. The retired game warden once headed the Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife's landowner relations program. After he retired, the department downgraded the program to just 10 percent of one warden's time.
Perhaps we have focused too strongly on the government to lead this effort. The Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife has been reluctant to tackle the job of maintaining good relations between landowners and sportsmen.
In fact, this legislative session the department opposed a bill proposed by the Sportsman's Alliance of Maine (for which I work) to create a landowner relations position in the department's Information and Education Division. A bill proposed by the Small Woodland Owners Association of Maine to establish landowner relations as a part of the mission of the Maine Warden Service was also opposed by the department.
An outside professional assessment of the Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife in 2004 offered some explanation of the problems, criticizing the department for "putting a good warden in this (landowner relations) position so he can be a sergeant, instead of filling the position with the right person, warden or not, (which) can lead to program ineffectiveness."
The assessment was performed by the Management Assistance Team of the International Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, and reported that "the landowner relations position would work well as a direct arm of the Commissioner, more high profile, using a broad range of skills and experience as well as sound comprehension of laws and regulations and law enforcement protocols."
The team's recommendations were the basis for the bills submitted by SAM and the Small Woodland Owners. The department's opposition was disappointing.
The Landowner and Sportsmen Relations Advisory Board could be the solution to this challenge. Peppard said as much, recently challenging his board to "develop a comprehensive landowner relations program that can be presented to the Legislature."
I believe the guiding principles for a landowner relations program should include the following:
n Funding must come from all recreationists.
n The state's program must be consolidated in and directed by one state agency, with all state conservation agencies contributing staff and other resources. Landowner relations should be part of the mission of each conservation agency and especially the Maine Warden Service.
n Services must include information and education (for both landowners and recreationists), enforcement of laws and rules governing users of private land and assistance to landowners who encounter problems or have questions. A free 800 telephone number should be available for landowners with questions or problems. A Web site should be established and maintained with up-to-date and comprehensive information, and television and print ads should be used seasonally.
n Delivery of services must occur primarily at the grassroots through clubs and other organizations (ATV, Snowmobile, Fish and Game), and participating clubs and organizations should receive most of the money collected by the state for this program.
Elements of the program should have measurable results that can be tracked and reported regularly, including landowner complaints to, and responses by, the Maine Warden Service.
Finally, responsibility for creating positive relationships with the private landowners who allow public access to and use of their land must rest with the individuals who benefit. Asking for permission to access and use private land and thanking landowners after you do, are your responsibility and the only guarantee that these opportunities will continue.
George Smith is executive director of the Sportsman's Alliance of Maine. He lives in Mount Vernon and can be reached at george@samcef.org.




Reader comments
Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First
I wouldn't condone anything you described and think people that litter should have their hands chopped off, but I also think there may be a little exaggeration in your desciption of events.
While fisherman should respect the space of others enjoying the lake....those same people should come to the realization they don't actually own the lake...only the dock they're sitting on.
report abuse
It would be better to have these boards, advisory committees and legislative committees made up of citizens that do not have special predatory and consumptive interests. The tragedy of the commons is already all too familiar in Maine.
report abuse
You'd have to provide a few examples for me to understand what "abuses" your talking about and how IF&W or sportsmen are responsible for said abuses.
I have 2 different size fishing boats,2 kayaks and a canoe so I spend a lot of time on the waters of Maine and I'm unsure of the abuses your talking about.report abuse
Shoreowners in Maine are very generous and like landowners throughout the State give permission for users to enjoy the benefits of use of their property, but recently there have been many users that abuse that priviledge and abuse the owners of the property. Our shores are very fragile and cannot withstand the kinds of abuse that has been so popular recently, the character of our lakes, ponds, and streams are quickly disappearing. Swimming, rafting, boating, or just trying to enjoy a peaceful day at the lake, or listen to the call of a loon are not activities that are appreciated by Inland Fish and Wildlife or sportmen's groups. The quiet enjoyment of ones property is abhorred by the State.report abuse
Show all 8 comments
You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.