Morning Sentinel
Time to get wind power moving
Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel Monday, June 18, 2007

Maybe we should go back to candles, ice chests and cooking over open flames.

Coal-burning power plants create air pollution and add to global warming. Nuclear power plants are costly to build, require extensive oversight and leave hazardous waste that lasts for centuries.

And wind power? Well, wind turbines are unsightly, can ruin vistas and they kill birds and bats by the thousands.

All these things are true but we need electricity, don't we?

We are fans of wind power. It is a clean, renewable energy source that doesn't cause climate change. And Maine is in an envious, and even unique, position to become a leader in siting wind turbines.

The word "siting" is where the problem comes in. People who live or recreate near potential wind-power farms often oppose the projects. Local leaders can be ill-equipped, technically and politically, to deal with the grassroots opposition.

So wind-power projects that would help Maine and the region greatly can get defeated, delayed or minimized in size due to intense, but relatively small, pockets of opposition.

The state has begun to show leadership on this issue. A task force has been formed by Gov. John Baldacci to help in siting large wind-power projects. That's where the big investments will be, as well as the big environmental payoffs.

But smaller projects, such as the current one being "re-planned" in Freedom, will come along as well -- and with them will also come controversy. Other states are already seeing the development of what's being called "micro wind power," which is a turbine here, a turbine there, including some on building tops in the middle of towns. It hasn't been easy to make happen elsewhere and it won't be easy to make happen here.

As the governor's task force begins its work, we urge its members to focus not only on the regulatory requirements for siting large projects, but to consider as well the needs of local officials from the state's smaller cities and towns, whose rules and regulations were drafted in the days before modern wind power came of age. The Maine Municipal Association and the State Planning Office will be particularly crucial partners in this aspect of the task force's work, which should focus on drafting siting criteria and model ordinances to govern wind power projects in municipalities.

Fighting over wind power developments such as the one haggled over endlessly in Freedom only succeeds in costing developers money, pitting neighbors against each other and delaying -- if not stopping -- our attempts to generate cleaner energy. That kind of energy -- human energy, we mean -- is better spent on solving problems than fighting their solutions.

Bookmark and share this story: digg del.icio.us Reddit


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

Jo of Augusta, ME
Jun 18, 2007 4:27 PM
Take a look at mountaintop removal mining, poor loon repructive rates due to mercury poisoining (take a look at a baby loon dying of mercury poisoning if you really need to be convinced of how "unsightly" wind power is), and all of the other environmental degradation caused by dirty energy to see what kind of power is really killing birds and other wildlife. We must not let NIMBYs control energy policy. Let science prevail.report abuse
whatnow of portland, ME
Jun 18, 2007 12:07 PM
What about Hydro? This country was built around the mighty rivers. The state of Maine has so many small rivers and streams that we don't need a huge dam, flooding thousands of acres of land. Install many small power plants on the thousands of streams. So what if one mini power plant can't supply the whole town. The combination of all of them would add up nicely.

Conservation is a nice dream, but that is all it is. Shlomit, just curious, do YOU over-consume? report abuse
Shlomit Auciello of Warren, ME
Jun 18, 2007 10:06 AM
A quick web search on recycling nuclear waste shows that the results of these efforts are mixed. Ultimately, after re-use there is still the same amount of hazardous waste. The IEEE estimates that recycling could extend the usefulness of the proposed Yucca Mountain disposal site by about 45 years (instead of it being full the day it opens using current disposal methods).

It's still a short-term solution. What we really need to do is grow up and recognize the limits of life on earth.

Conservation is the only way we can adequately address the problems of human over-consumption.report abuse
Eric Ritter of Monmouth, ME
Jun 18, 2007 8:17 AM
Nuclear power is the way to go, it's very clean, effeicent, and cost effective, not to mention the fuel is home grown. As to the acusation that the waste is the problem, recycle it, like the French do!

The Greenies won't be satisfied until we all live like the opening paragraph of this "editorial".report abuse

Show all 5 comments

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.