Monday, May 21, 2007
from the Kennebec Journal
Sport of Kings
Collins: Detecting 'home-grown terrorists' difficult
Recession over? Don't tell the hungry
Downtown remains optimistic
Health-care bill clears key hurdle
A chance to cash in
A tough way to end it
Windham pulls away to win Class A title
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Kennebec Journal
from the Morning Sentinel
Old building gets new lease on life
Freedom brings perils along with privileges, Sen. Collins says
At food pantries, recession still very much alive
BILL CLEARS KEY HURDLE IN SENATE
FARMINGTON Volunteers take day to replace roof
OAKLAND Sewer project finishes first phase, ready for next
Black Bears fall to Wildcats in finale
Eagles rally to state title
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Morning Sentinel
Those are tough words. Personal and likely offensive, especially when I use them to describe an editorial that appeared in the Kennebec Journal on May 16.
They are also apt.
It's easy to take shots at the faceless workers in state government who toil in near anonymity until something goes wrong -- trying to do the right thing and help some of Maine's most vulnerable residents.
What's harder is to get the facts and present them fairly. But that's the expectation for a paper of the KJ's quality.
In its May 16 editorial, the Kennebec Journal attacked the state and specifically those who are working diligently to both deliver a fully-functional computer system to Maine and work with providers to process current Medicaid claims.
Powerful, negative words led the editorial. As is sometimes the case, the opinion piece did not tell the full story.
Maine has had a difficult time with the computer system that process Medicaid bills from doctors and other service providers. That much of the story is true.
Contrary to what the editorial would have the public believe, the system processes 96 percent of new claims correctly -- this surpasses the industry standard for commercial insurance. In addition, of the claims that are currently unpaid, almost half of them are less than 90 days old and 99 percent are paid within 180 days.
It's not perfect, but we aren't throwing up our hands and giving up either. We are working with providers -- the ones who are willing -- to make sure they get paid.
The last paragraph suggests that a 14-year-old "diabolical genius could figure this one out." Perhaps hyperbole has no bounds.
Unlike a home computer that can be fixed by many of its users, or at the very least by a local PC or big-box store, the needs of the state computer system and the requirements that are mandated by the federal government are complex.
Meeting federal requirements is critical and moving in a new direction by hiring an outside contractor to manage the system is Maine's best and fastest opportunity to satisfy these requirements.
A certified system will allow Maine to match every state dollar with two from the federal government. With these dollars, we help more than 270,000 Mainers access medical and long-term care services.
Despite the improvements we've made in billing, the system must be replaced. There are certain things that the system must be able to do in order to meet the federal government's requirements and to assure their financial participation in the future.
The current system can't do them all and may never be able to do so. We must move toward a new system.
A new system can't be put in place overnight. It's not a question of ordering a couple of Dells online and plugging them into the wall.
The reality is that a three-year timeline is based on the experience of states that have recently completed the process. If we don't set realistic and responsible timetables, we'll be a lot more likely to repeat the mistakes of the past.
We understand the hardship that has been placed on the providers of Medicaid. And we all feel the frustration oozing from the KJ's editorial.
The staff at the Office of MaineCare Services works hard every single day to help providers on a case-by-case basis to solve their problems. That's not going to change, no matter how many names we're called.
It's difficult to stand idly by while these hardworking, dedicated and committed people are called incompetent, which could not be further from the truth.
Medicaid billing is detailed and complex. I am confident that these issues will be resolved by those who are in the trenches today -- people who I am proud to call competent colleagues.
Brenda M. Harvey is Commissioner of the Maine Department of Health and Human Services.

Reader comments
Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First
previous page | next page1-10 of 12 comments:
Medicaid billing IS INDEED complex.
Commissioner Harvey was not in charge during system development, or even within the first year the system was live. Why should she be held accountable for something she had nothing to do with, when she was appointed well AFTER the MECMS mess was under-way? As far as I can see, she is a straight-shooter who is trying to do the best she can within a nightmare.
report abuse
Your department stopped sending monthly MECMS updates last November. Why?
Yes, maybe 96 percent of CURRENT claims are being processed correctly, but what about the huge MESS and large amount of claims that are still unaccounted for? This is what the public needs to know. You, say you are working with providers, well the ones that have contacted me, haven't been impressed. You are asking us to do paperwork that this computer system should be doing, ie crossover claims. Certainly you jest when you say "We understand the hardhip that has been placed on the providers of Medicaid" You should only understand, if suddenly your boss stopped paying you. Let me know when and if that happens.
Medicaid billing is NOT detailed nor complex, if you have experienced billing staff. I have 23 years of medical billing experience, and have seen nothing like this with any other insurance companies.
Ms. Harvey, if I were you, I wouldn't be taking shots at the Kennebec Journal for not presenting the facts fairly. THINK ABOUT IT!!!!!!!!!!
report abuse
Brenda Harvey says "..hiring an outside contractor to manage the system...", thats double talk to mean outsourcing. What she didn't tell you is it will cost 2 - 3 times as much money. She did say a whole new system. You've just spent $50 million, and the new system will cost you between $80 - 130 million ( and that's on top of the $50 million).
Oh yeah, it gets better. The "outside contractor" will get a contract for about 3 years. After that, it goes out to bid again through the RFP process. There's only 3 companies in the US that can do this work. You may be looking at a different "outside contractor" in another 3 years and paying another $50 - $100 million for another "new" system. The systems are proprietary!
report abuse
"We found [MaineCare] did not establish effective controls to ensure that Medicaid claims were processed correctly and paid appropriately, and that all claim-related expenditures were reported accurately for Federal reimbursement."
http://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region10/10500007.htm
report abuse
Trying and Doing are two different things Ms. Harvey.
Who is being held accountable for this mess and the waste of $50 million in taxpayer money? What efforts are being made to recover the money spent so far from the consultants and vendor? Why did Maine decide that the computer system used successfully in a number of other states (and met federal requirements) wasn't appropriate for Maine? What IDIOT decided to create a system from scratch?
The workers in the trenches may not be incompetent Ms. Harvey, but you and your management team certainly appear to be incompetent. Why no accountability Ms. Harvey? The very fact that you cannot or will not hold people accountable speaks volumes about YOUR competence to run DHHS.
A lot more DOING is need by the government in this state. Trying isn't good enough.report abuse
This is not a problem with the front line DHHS employee. It's a problem with the State of Maine's computer geeks who were unable to adequately manage the development of a medical billing system.
The best solution now is to import a working system and adapt it to the State's needs. And, let's test it adequately before we throw the switch. That's standard practice. It didn't happen and you see the result.report abuse
"We're trying hard, don't criticize" is often the message touted either at 10-year olds little league games, or by adults who don't perform at work at the level they should. In the former it works, in the latter it doesn't. We're not children anymore, and we all have jobs to do.
Ms. Harvey, in the real world (i.e. not state government), trying hard does not equate to doing your job well. If you try hard, but fail to achieve results, there will be criticism and repurcussions. This editorial seems odd to me.report abuse
Of course no one imagines implementation of a major system to be like "ordering a couple of Dells online and plugging them into the wall". Because if that were the case, at least the state could call the help line and get the PC running. Quite frankly, I find that statement condecending, as if we as citizens of Maine, could not comprehend that complexities of that system with the same understanding as Ms. Harvey.
In dealing with Information Systems in business, we deal with "deliverables", that being the successful implementation of systems. As Commissioner, Ms. Harvey, I would like to ask, What is the state of your deliverables? I think that it might be time that you be held accountable for the system's failures, for failing to deliver results to the people of the State of Maine. Not writing self-serving editorials to distort the facts around this issue to save your job. If people paid their taxes on the same timeframe that MHHS pays providers, the state government would cease to function. report abuse
previous page | next page
You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.