Morning Sentinel
Addressing the real problems of REAL ID
Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel Monday, February 12, 2007

The REAL ID Act was passed by Congress in 2005. Part of a suite of measures to beef up homeland security, the act requires that by mid-2008, Americans must have a federally approved ID card -- most likely an enhanced driver's license -- to travel on airplanes, collect government payments or use government services and open a bank account. The national ID cards would have to be machine-readable.

As the deadline approaches for compliance with the act, opposition to the mandate has grown. Late last month, the Maine Legislature became the first in the nation to pass a measure against the requirement, unequivocally refusing to implement the act and urging Congress to repeal it. Too expensive, too fast, too much of an invasion of privacy and too burdensome to administer, said a bipartisan coalition of Maine lawmakers. Estimate of the cost of compliance in Maine alone is $185 million.

The Legislature's rejection made news around the nation. What Maine started threatened to become a tidal wave of state opposition. In an effort to stem the momentum and salvage what she considers good about the requirement, U.S. Sen. Susan Collins Friday announced she's introducing legislation to delay implementation of the act and provide states with a more reasonable time frame for complying with its new standards for drivers' licenses. "The costs of complying with REAL ID are enormous and overly burdensome to states, including Maine," said Collins.

We agree. Collins' legislation puts the brakes on a mandate that raises significant concerns, as well as the broader question of whether the REAL ID would ultimately be effective. Her bill would give the Department of Homeland Security the ability to delay or waive REAL ID requirements if states don't have the technical capability to comply with it, or the money. It furthermore calls to the discussion table the right group of people to hammer out an alternative: federal and state officials, privacy advocates and others with a stake in the matter. We're encouraged that this senator, who has made her name as an advocate of effective and real security measures, has focused on finding a solution to the real problems posed by REAL ID.


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

Phillip Dill of Montville, ME
Feb 12, 2007 11:51 AM
I think it is just another way they (the gov.) can keep us under their thumb. I know I will not go for it. I and you should be telling our gov. we do not want it. If enough people do it. We could stop them. It is getting more like Cuba. Prety quick we will be like Cuba, Austraila, and some of the other countrys that just take rights away from the people. Austraila now has had their guns taken away from them, and had them chopped up. Don't say it can't happen here. Look and New York,City. You can get a gun permit there, But you will go though HELL! Now we will get the REAL ID! An I see them having a chip in it,so when they want to find out where you are. They will check out where your chip is and there you are. I hope I am wrong but I don't belive it. Their are a lot of Sattlites. Up there. report abuse

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.