Morning Sentinel
Allen-Collins race likely to cause a political avalanche
Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel Thursday, February 08, 2007

Political campaigning is no longer something conducted after decent intervals have elapsed between elections. Alas, it has become a perennial exercise.

Here it is, nearly two years before the next general election, and we already have more candidates for president than there are voters. Furthermore, Maine seems to be developing a huge supply of congressional contestants nearly a full year before such maneuvering traditionally gets under way.

What's going on here, anyway?

Call it the avalanche effect. First District Rep. Tom Allen, a Democrat, has made it pretty clear he plans to challenge Republican Sen. Susan Collins in her re-election bid next year, and this has triggered a rush of potential candidates in both parties for Allen's seat.

Exploratory committees akimbo, a slew of former state senators has stepped forward, including two-term Senate President Mark Lawrence of Kittery and two former Senate majority leaders, Michael Brennan of Portland and Chellie Pingree of North Haven, all Democrats.

Republicans on the list include former state senators Peter Cianchette of South Portland, Charles Summers of Scarborough and Phil Harriman of Yarmouth, as well as former state Rep. Darlene Curley of Scarborough who ran against Allen the last time out and got squashed by a 2-1 margin.

The Associated Press recently identified 14 possible entries in the 1st District race next year. The list almost certainly will grow as the year wears on. Nobody has really announced yet, at least not officially, although Collins -- the key player in all this -- has made it plain she will run for a third term, earlier assurances to the contrary notwithstanding. She turns out to be one of those lip-service term limits advocates who doesn't want voters to read her lips anymore.

You remember term limits, the idea that legally mandated turnover in public office is healthy if not altogether democratic. Maine voters imposed limits on state legislative service several years ago and we've debated the merits and drawbacks ever since.

Maine also approved a referendum establishing term limits for members of Congress, but that one was ruled unconstitutional.

These days, candidates generally dance around the issue, either by arguing that the best form of term limits is the election process itself or by embracing self- imposed term limits, pledging in advance to serve only a specific period of time in office and then retire.

Collins is in the latter category, although she was never very forceful about it. She initially revealed plans to serve no more than two terms during a 1996 candidates forum in Sanford when she first ran for the Senate. She reiterated this stance in a letter to a Portland constituent in the fall of 2002 just before getting re-elected to her second (presumably final) six-year term. By October of last year, she had a change of heart, telling editorial board members of the Lewiston Sun-Journal she planned to run again in 2008 after all.

Collins explained her epiphany this way: "I've found that I really underestimated the importance of seniority and how much difference it makes when you are a more senior member."

Put another way, the more power you get in political office, the more attractive you find the idea of holding onto it.

But none of this is likely to affect Collins' re-election chances appreciably. Maine voters usually demand a fairly compelling reason for removing an incumbent from office and her modest little flip-flop on this issue hardly qualifies. In fact, it may only shore up her reputation for independent pragmatism, probably her most attractive quality.

All of which serves to buttress the feeling within Maine's political community that Allen will be making a big mistake if he runs against Collins next year, that he will be sacrificing a safe seat in a Congress newly dominated by Democrats for a probably hopeless shot at the Senate.

True, while it is rare for a member of Congress to knock off a Senate incumbent running for re-election, there is some recent historical precedent for it.

In 1972, 2nd District Rep. William D. Hathaway, a Democrat, astonished everyone by defeating the venerable Sen. Margaret Chase Smith against all odds. Six years later, Hathaway himself was ousted by 2nd District Rep. William S. Cohen.

But the conditions in those two races were radically different from those involved in a Collins-Allen matchup.

I referred above to Collins as the key player in this drama, but actually it is Allen who serves that role.

He still has time to call off the avalanche. My guess is he won't.

Jim Brunelle is a weekly columnist and has been commenting on Maine issues for more than 40 years. He lives in Cape Elizabeth and can be reached at jbrune@maine.rr.com.


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

Carter Hilton of Portland, ME
Feb 11, 2007 9:37 PM
Actually, to be accurate, Senator Collins voted YEA in FAVOR of moving to debate of the resolution. report abuse
Sheila Evans of Chelsea, ME
Feb 8, 2007 11:56 AM
Yesterday Senator Collins was one of the YEA votes to suppress moving forward on the issue of a resolution to Iraq...and from Sidney Blumenthal we learn:
"Even Sen. John Warner of Virginia, the Republican cosponsor of the resolution against the escalation along with Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., cast his lot with the Republican martyr brigade, voting to suppress his own measure."

So Senator Collins may be an egg, but considering her forked tongue on the issue of Iraq, I'd say a rotten one... and yes,the editorial is about posturing by candidates for election to the Senate but whether they start early, middle or late, all of the candidates will discuss the Iraq War as the central issue.report abuse
Jim Smith of Buxton, ME
Feb 8, 2007 10:59 AM
The line "She reiterated this stance in a letter to a Portland constituent in the fall of 2002" was sent to Carl Lindemann - the same Carl Lindemann who spends most of his time in Texas, but claims to be looking out for true Mainers. The same Carl Lindemann who wasted taxpayers time and money trying to lead the way arguing about TABOR after it was defeated in the election, and also caused wasted time discussing Maine Heritage Policy Center's role in TABOR (again, after it was defeated and a dead issue). I voted against TABOR too, but this man and the letters he received and the things he heard kept the issue a point of contention after the people had spoken. Get off the highhorse, and run for office if you want to make a real POSITIVE difference in Maine!

He writes a letter to her in 2002, then moves out of state, and then tries to stir things up again. This man is not a true Mainer, he is a big talker who won't personally take action against these things. Mr. Lindemann lets others do his dirty work, and by sending that letter back in 2002, he was simply trying to set somebody up in the future. That is not concern, and it is certainly not honorable. It is deceitful and childish to say the least.

I like Senator Collins, who can truly deny that she is great for the people of Maine? And although Sheila wants to make it about the party, I would gladly vote based on who BEST REPRESENTS Maine and all of us True Mainers. A lesser candidate in either party does us no good - that is the bottom line.

I am an independent, but Senator Collins is one of the good eggs, and this Mr. Lindemann trying to shout as loudly as possible from the sidelines (as far away as Texas) is a sad attempt for more political wasting of time and avoiding the real issues. It is sad, and I for one am sick of it - especially for our great state.report abuse
Hawkeye9909 of Portland, ME
Feb 8, 2007 10:56 AM
Sheila, I thought this article concerned the early posturing by candidates for elected office, not an indictment of the war in Iraq.....but since you bring it up, hasn't Sen. Collins signed on with her support for the Warner resolution, thus working against the concensus of her own political party?report abuse

Show all 5 comments

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.