HOME ----- -MAINEJOBS -REAL ESTATE -WHEELS -MARKETPLACE ----- NEWS Local and State Midday/4PM Reports AP Wire Week in Photos WEATHER 5-day Forecast On the Ocean SPORTS High Schools Red Sox Sea Dogs BUSINESS News Blogs Maine News Direct Classifieds ENTERTAINMENT Calendar Movies Dining Music Theater Art TRAVEL Maine Regions From Away Vacation Rentals Lodging Guide OUTDOORS Hiking Fishing Trail Head Campground Guide BLOGS Late Hits Kid Tracks A Dog's Life More blogs 20 BELOW Teen Blogs One-Minute Wonders Reindeer Rock-off MAINEJOBS Search Jobs Post a Job News and Resources Employer Profiles REAL ESTATE Renting Buying Town Info Moving Here Retiring Here WHEELS Classifieds Resources and Info Featured Dealers MILESTONES Graduations Celebrations Obituaries MARKETPLACE Classifieds Special Sections ADVERTISING 5 Reasons Advertising Products MEMBER CENTER Press Herald Sunday Telegram Kennebec Journal Morning Sentinel MaineToday.com

Network Affiliate
Kennebec Journal and Morning Sentinel Kennebec Journal Morning Sentinel

Tuesday, October 10, 2006

Editorial:

Nuclear waste: Uncle Sam's unmet obligations

Copyright © 2006 Blethen Maine Newspapers Inc.

 

E-mail this story to a friend

 

 


ADVERTISEMENT


 

A long, long time ago, when the nuclear power industry was just getting started with substantial help from the federal government, Congress passed the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. That act said the federal government must take responsibility for managing nuclear waste.

In a series of followup pieces of legislation, including the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 and a subsequent 1987 amendment, Congress authorized the federal government to collect money from nuclear power consumers -- through a surcharge on their electricity bills -- to pay for the ultimate disposal of nuclear waste. The law directed the feds to begin removing high-level radioactive waste from states by early 1998 as their part of the bargain.

The federal government has collected $24 billion in payments from electricity ratepayers across the country, $279 million of it from Maine Yankee customers. But it has done nothing to haul away the 550 metric tons of nuclear waste stored in this state, or the waste lying around in any other state, because they have not been able to convince any state to permanently accept the waste.

Forgive us, but this ranks as deadbeat behavior, even if it comes from Uncle Sam. We pay the government lots of money to do something, and they don't do it. Generally, a case like this of payments made and services never rendered is a recipe for a lawsuit.

Which is just how Maine Yankee and other nuclear power plants across the country saw it. In a series of separate lawsuits filed years ago, they asked for damages against the U.S. Department of Energy for not holding to its agreement to remove the radioactive waste. This past week, those actions finally bore fruit, when the U.S. Court of Federal Claims ordered the feds to pay Maine Yankee ratepayers $75.8 million in damages. Damages in the tens of millions were awarded to ratepayers of other utilities as well.

Now, don't go spending that money on a weekend shopping spree or fancy dinner yet. It's highly likely that the federal government will appeal the ruling, and the ratepayers' money that should rightfully be returned to those who paid it will continue to be tied up in the politics of nuclear waste disposal. Yet the ruling is at least a sign that it is still the law of the land that money should be paid only for services rendered. In the end, of course, we'd rather the federal government kept our money, took the nuclear waste out of Maine and stored it safely elsewhere, as it promised to do a very long time ago.


Reader Comments
Share your thoughts about this story.

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

Eileen McCabe of Taylorsville, UT
Oct 11, 2006 2:29 PM
Thank you Shlomit for your comments. Here is my solution to the nuclear waste dilemma

Repeal the Nuclear Waste Policy Act.
This policy is an immoral law and should be repealed. Power companies who wish to go nuclear must deal with the waste themselves following NRC guidelines, instead of foisting it off on someone else. If our national policies can change to regard blacks as people instead of property, to give the vote to women, and to repeal prohibition, we can certainly repeal a corrupt law that gives unfair market advantage to one energy producing sector, while feeding its weapons machine.

Compensate power companies for their outlay into the Waste Fund.
I support the recent decision that awarded damages to the power companies for their payments into the Waste Fund. A promise was made, and due compensation should be paid. This could be done with funds currently earmarked for subsidies.

Stop subsidizing a toxic industry that exploits indigenous communities and contributes to weapons proliferation.
An industry which has been responsible for the poisoning of Navaho communities through poor uranium mining practices, forced relocation to known contaminated sites, wholesale theft of land from the Western Shoshone for the Nevada Test Site and Yucca Mountain and exploitation of the Goshute Band in Utah does not deserve such subsidies. Let it compete on its merits with other energy producing technologies. The waste produced by plants can be used in many forms for the construction of nuclear weapons, and has been subject to loss, theft and smuggling.

Revise NRC policies to allow more control by local communities.
If you don’t want nuclear waste in your state, fight against efforts to locate nuclear plants in your state. To do this, we must fight for a larger say by local communities in the siting and re-licensing of nuclear plants. Current policies disallow most local input, especially in the re-licensing phase. Just ask folks in the communities around Oyster Creek, Vermont Yankee and Pilgrim.

Store existing waste in hardened on-site storage.
If you already have nuclear power plants, fight against the re-licensing, and take the moral high ground; Diligently safeguard the waste from which you have benefited in above ground monitored facilities. This allows for constant surveillance. A hole in the ground, wherever it is located, is susceptible to leakage. Hanford, WA and Savannah River, GA are both cases where strategies for burying waste have failed, and local water supplies are being contaminated.

Close down existing nuclear plants and transition to other sources of energy generation.
Local, smaller scale plants are more reliable, and are subject to more local control. Wind and even solar are becoming cost competitive with natural gas. If waste is stored on site, plant infrastructure can be maintained, and costly decommissioning expenses avoided. It also prevents the transportation and dumping of the radioactive dismantled and ground up plant to other communities like Utah.

Eileen McCabe
Associate Director, Shundahai Network www.shundahai.org
report abuse
Shlomit Auciello of Warren, ME
Oct 11, 2006 11:13 AM
For quite some time it's been apparent that no one knows what to do with this highly toxic trash. Using depleted uranium in weapons of war has literally backfired on our own soldiers.

Perhaps those shareholders and consumers who profited by and supported the growth of the nuclear power industry could each offer to take a portion home for themselves and their descendants to guard from leakage and harm. Instead, we expect the feds to "find someplace" to hide this evidence of our overconsumption. Some years ago, I was ashamed as Mainers voted to allow Maine Yankee's waste to be sent to a poverty-stricken part of Texas. The effort failed, through no help from us.

Don't want to be culpable for the potential horror of leaking casks and radioactive bloom? Sign up for "green power" at meipl.org and TURN OFF THE LIGHTS WHEN YOU LEAVE THE ROOM!report abuse
Mike of Augusta, ME
Oct 10, 2006 10:30 PM
What? The government not doing what they said they'd do with money they collected?

Hmm... gas taxes for the highways, cigarette tax to offset healthcare costs, etc., etc... Sounds about right.report abuse

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.