It only takes decency — and a little money
Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel Sunday, July 29, 2007

Staff photo by Jim Evans
enlarge
Staff photo by Jim Evans
LOAVES AND FISHES: Russ and Myrna Hamm helped start the food pantry, called Loaves and Fishes, in Albion when they learned about 80 people in their town were having to go to another town for help. The pantry is open to all from the basement of the Albion Christian Church.
Staff graphic by Sharon Wood
enlarge
Staff graphic by Sharon Wood

Seventh in a 7-day series

For I was hungry, and ye gave me food: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in. –Matthew 25: 35-40

Whether our motivation is religious or secular, spiritual or pragmatic, we must feed those among us who are hungry.

They are many.

They are our neighbors, our friends, our co-workers, our family.

They are our children and our parents.

They are strangers.

All deserve our compassion and our action.

Why?

Choose your justification:

From a biblical perspective, all who are hungry are the children of God, first among equals and more deserving because of their suffering.

From a political perspective, the hungry cannot achieve the promise of America — “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” To be hungry is to live an incomplete life, to be enslaved to one’s most basic need, to be sad and defeated and lacking in dignity.

That is not the promise of America.

From a pragmatic perspective, hungry children, hungry workers, hungry seniors and hungry veterans cost us money. Hungry children don’t learn well, hungry workers don’t perform well, hungry seniors and veterans get sick and need to be taken care of, often with our tax dollars.

That’s not sentiment speaking: A recent study by researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health puts the cost of hunger to the nation at a minimum of $90 billion a year in reduced workplace productivity, health-care costs and charitable donations. Lead author J. Larry Brown concluded: “It costs many times more to maintain the problem than to actually end hunger.”

And from a moral perspective, it is wrong to allow hunger among us. It is unacceptable that in this country of plenty, there are many who are not ensured the fundamental human right to adequate nourishment.

In this series, we have brought you the faces of hunger in Maine. They are not the faces of an alien tribe in our midst. The only difference between the hungry and those who are not is that the hungry don’t have enough food.

Our purpose in this investigation has been to help Mainers understand how pervasive hunger is — and how hidden. In its very ordinariness, its wholesale acceptance by us as a fact of life, hunger is a rebuke to our morality.

We must become intolerant of hunger. It must become as dreaded as high taxes, as repulsive as sexual predators, as reviled as terrorism. It must become as unacceptable as all the other things we rail against daily. But first, we must resolve among ourselves to see hunger, to count it, to take its full measure and respond to it wholly and in a sustained way — not simply by pitching a quarter into a donation jar.

And then, once we understand how pervasive hunger is in Maine, we must act. Specifically:

The state should mandate that all schools that serve reduced-price and free lunch also offer reduced-price and free breakfast.

The state must effectively promote the school breakfast program so that the percentage of students getting free and reduced price breakfast doubles.

The federal government should change the standard deduction used in calculating food stamp benefits, which keeps benefits at a ludicrous $1 per meal average benefit per person. That would increase monthly benefits by $24 to an average household of three or fewer members.

The federal government must raise the cutoff level for food stamp eligibility to allow benefits for those working their way out of dependence on the program.

These are modest, but essential, moves that should be taken to begin the end of hunger in Maine.

Much more will need to be done over many years and across a much bigger landscape. Making higher education more affordable and accessible, accomplishing economic development in some of our must rural and hard-hit areas, retooling our public assistance programs to reward, not punish, initiative — these are all long-term initiatives that should, ultimately, bear fruit. But the very largeness of the task should not force us into willful blindness to the things we can and must do immediately.

What about the cost to Maine taxpayers of ending hunger in our state? Isn’t there consensus that Maine spends more than it can afford now on human service programs?

In many respects, we agree with these rhetorical sentiments. And this newspaper has and will continue to argue for a combination of reduced public spending in some areas, and greater investment in areas that promise long-term prosperity for every Mainer.

But no one can make progress when they don’t know where their next meal will come from. The cost of immediate and effective action to stem hunger in Maine is not so great, especially if the economic and moral cost to our entire society of not doing it is greater.

In the end, this issue is not simply about the hungry among us. There is an Old Testament verse in Isaiah that speaks to the task before us:

“If you offer yourself to the hungry, and satisfy the afflicted one, then your light will shine in the darkness, and your night will be like noonday.”

Hunger is a terrible scourge that is allowed to continue because it lives in the shameful shadow regions of our lives. We must force it into the light — where it cannot survive.

Bookmark and share this story: digg del.icio.us Reddit


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest First | Newest first

Nonny of Gainesville, FL
Jul 29, 2007 5:53 AM
How ironic that this article reaches into the very soul of Christianity to push for more tax money while Jesus, the center of Christianity, was 100% against the tax collectors. He was for individuals helping eachother, not corrupt humans (AKA govt) taking from some to give to others. And how ironic that stats on journalists (U.S. journalists) show that the majority of them do not classify themselves as practicing Christians. In fact, many detest organized religion and list themselves as "atheist," "agnostic" or "secular humanist", yet it appears from this article that reporters will "use" (however dishonest) religion if it helps to push their social agendas. Yes, we can do better to help others with regard to housing and food, but our current track with regard to robbing Peter to pay Paul is NOT working and NEVER will. Until we tackle the "WHY'S" of poverty (and stop making it easy to be poor), we will never end hunger. We are doing a disservice by sticking a "victim" label on foreheads and not "teaching people how to fish" (REQUIRING them to fish!). When we say we want to end hunger yet our programs make it easy to have children we cannot afford (out of wedlock, w/o benefit of marriage, etc), we are PUSHING for increased poverty. Yes, we MUST do better and we must DEMAND that individuals start doing better as well. report abuse
tiredtaxpaye of central, ME
Jul 29, 2007 7:36 AM
funny the only time democrats (media) uses the word of god is for a cause of more taxes on thouse of us already the highest taxed ..........
mainers!report abuse
browneyes of Belgrade, ME
Jul 29, 2007 8:14 AM
I found your article on suffering to be very much needed. Nobody in this state should suffer the way we allow it to happen. It seems it is always the most vulnerable that have it the worst. Our children and our elderly. We help so many people around the world that are suffering, which is great, you would think we could do better at home. THIS IS NOT ABOUT TAXES. THIS IS ABOUT PEOPLE BEING HUNGRY! Obviously, the people that think it is have never been hungry or have never gone without a meal. You probably have all kinds of money and never had to worry about it. I can only guess. Why else would you mention it?report abuse
Naran of Kennebunk, ME
Jul 29, 2007 9:03 AM

More undiluted codswallop from the Socialist brigade in Maine.

They're all for helping others, as long as they can help themselves to your wallet in order to pay the freight for their own good deeds.

The Education Empire needs a wakeup call - there is no more money in Maine's ordinary taxpayer wallets with which to fund #211 social service phone lines, endless food stamp benefits for those who don't truly need it, and the armies of eager state employees inducting ever more out-of-state residents into the welfare rolls.

Find me another state in the union where from day one of residency, a person can qualify for subsidized housing, welfare, food stamps, free medical care, free childcare, and free college classes, for at least 60 months. FROM DAY ONE OF RESIDENCY.

Is it any wonder that we have floods of folks moving to Maine from other, less generous states; meanwhile seeing an equal exodus of working, taxpaying Mainers?

Who's going to be left in five years to pay the bills for all these new social programs?report abuse

Show all 33 comments

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.