Search Maine Yellow Pages 
Log In | Register | Help
It only takes decency — and a little money
Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel Sunday, July 29, 2007

Staff photo by Jim Evans
enlarge
Staff photo by Jim Evans
LOAVES AND FISHES: Russ and Myrna Hamm helped start the food pantry, called Loaves and Fishes, in Albion when they learned about 80 people in their town were having to go to another town for help. The pantry is open to all from the basement of the Albion Christian Church.
Staff graphic by Sharon Wood
enlarge
Staff graphic by Sharon Wood

Seventh in a 7-day series

For I was hungry, and ye gave me food: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in. –Matthew 25: 35-40

Whether our motivation is religious or secular, spiritual or pragmatic, we must feed those among us who are hungry.

They are many.

They are our neighbors, our friends, our co-workers, our family.

They are our children and our parents.

They are strangers.

All deserve our compassion and our action.

Why?

Choose your justification:

From a biblical perspective, all who are hungry are the children of God, first among equals and more deserving because of their suffering.

From a political perspective, the hungry cannot achieve the promise of America — “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” To be hungry is to live an incomplete life, to be enslaved to one’s most basic need, to be sad and defeated and lacking in dignity.

That is not the promise of America.

From a pragmatic perspective, hungry children, hungry workers, hungry seniors and hungry veterans cost us money. Hungry children don’t learn well, hungry workers don’t perform well, hungry seniors and veterans get sick and need to be taken care of, often with our tax dollars.

That’s not sentiment speaking: A recent study by researchers at the Harvard School of Public Health puts the cost of hunger to the nation at a minimum of $90 billion a year in reduced workplace productivity, health-care costs and charitable donations. Lead author J. Larry Brown concluded: “It costs many times more to maintain the problem than to actually end hunger.”

And from a moral perspective, it is wrong to allow hunger among us. It is unacceptable that in this country of plenty, there are many who are not ensured the fundamental human right to adequate nourishment.

In this series, we have brought you the faces of hunger in Maine. They are not the faces of an alien tribe in our midst. The only difference between the hungry and those who are not is that the hungry don’t have enough food.

Our purpose in this investigation has been to help Mainers understand how pervasive hunger is — and how hidden. In its very ordinariness, its wholesale acceptance by us as a fact of life, hunger is a rebuke to our morality.

We must become intolerant of hunger. It must become as dreaded as high taxes, as repulsive as sexual predators, as reviled as terrorism. It must become as unacceptable as all the other things we rail against daily. But first, we must resolve among ourselves to see hunger, to count it, to take its full measure and respond to it wholly and in a sustained way — not simply by pitching a quarter into a donation jar.

And then, once we understand how pervasive hunger is in Maine, we must act. Specifically:

The state should mandate that all schools that serve reduced-price and free lunch also offer reduced-price and free breakfast.

The state must effectively promote the school breakfast program so that the percentage of students getting free and reduced price breakfast doubles.

The federal government should change the standard deduction used in calculating food stamp benefits, which keeps benefits at a ludicrous $1 per meal average benefit per person. That would increase monthly benefits by $24 to an average household of three or fewer members.

The federal government must raise the cutoff level for food stamp eligibility to allow benefits for those working their way out of dependence on the program.

These are modest, but essential, moves that should be taken to begin the end of hunger in Maine.

Much more will need to be done over many years and across a much bigger landscape. Making higher education more affordable and accessible, accomplishing economic development in some of our must rural and hard-hit areas, retooling our public assistance programs to reward, not punish, initiative — these are all long-term initiatives that should, ultimately, bear fruit. But the very largeness of the task should not force us into willful blindness to the things we can and must do immediately.

What about the cost to Maine taxpayers of ending hunger in our state? Isn’t there consensus that Maine spends more than it can afford now on human service programs?

In many respects, we agree with these rhetorical sentiments. And this newspaper has and will continue to argue for a combination of reduced public spending in some areas, and greater investment in areas that promise long-term prosperity for every Mainer.

But no one can make progress when they don’t know where their next meal will come from. The cost of immediate and effective action to stem hunger in Maine is not so great, especially if the economic and moral cost to our entire society of not doing it is greater.

In the end, this issue is not simply about the hungry among us. There is an Old Testament verse in Isaiah that speaks to the task before us:

“If you offer yourself to the hungry, and satisfy the afflicted one, then your light will shine in the darkness, and your night will be like noonday.”

Hunger is a terrible scourge that is allowed to continue because it lives in the shameful shadow regions of our lives. We must force it into the light — where it cannot survive.

Bookmark and share this story: digg del.icio.us Reddit


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

tap04950 of MADISON, ME
Jan 9, 2008 10:27 AM
Right now we have 4 growing boys. My husband doesn't work due to medical reasons. We receive no benefits and that's ok. It does bother me to see 19 - 20 yr old girls collecting welfare and every other benefit out there. Cutting her off won't help, how about having women that can't work, watch her children while she goes to school or work?? Why does the state cut all benefits rather then adjusting them? Make it more rewarding to work rather then sit home and collect. Some of these young people mimic their parents and learn how to work the system. I see them buying lobster in the summer. I can't, and I work. They load up on soda, chips, etc. which will cause issues later. The system needs new rules and strictor monitoring. My mom can't get help because she earns $3.00 over the limit on social security. Our seniors and children are hurting and it seems the government just can't get the changes done in a timely manner. Welfare and benefits should be a last resort not a career.report abuse
Jacob Taylor of Durham, ME
Aug 1, 2007 8:43 AM
KUDOS to KJ!
Well written, well reported, great job!
It appears there has been some negative feedback to the story, it also appears these people weren't raised to help your fellow man.
Hunger is everywhere, when are some of you going to step up.
I am college educated, great job, supportive family...and I still had to seek food assistance in my earlier days. It was degrading that I had to show people I needed help, but I did it to survive. Now I am successful and have the ability to give back, financially and by volunteering.
This article exposed the truth about the "working poor" in Maine, well done. There are many that don't want a handout, they are hardworking but can't get by in this society.
Kudos KJ!
One thing everyone can do is stop talking and start doing: support your local food assistance program(pantries, kitchen, shelters), support the state's top notch food bank, the Good Shepherd Food Bank, support your local farms by growing or buying a row for your local pantry or the state's food bank.
I can't say again how wonderful the series is, thank you, thank you, thank you.report abuse
Durhamite of Durham, ME
Aug 1, 2007 8:36 AM
Great Article, KJ you rock. Way to expose the truth that no one likes to admit.report abuse
John of Camden, ME
Jul 30, 2007 5:39 PM
Look, I'm too cheap to pay $48 dollars a month for cable. I'm too cheap to buy a cell phone. If I smoked, I wouldn't pay $5 a pack for cigarettes. I'm not rich, but I'm not poor. I'm sure a lot of Mainers may be the same way. I have no trouble giving money to people who need it. But I'm sure as hell going to fight to pay more money into a system that helps people who are supposedly poor and don't have enough money for food, and yet can seem to afford $600 (tax-free dollars, mind you) a year on cable TV and maybe as much on cigarettes and lottery tickets. There is plenty of waste and excess in the system. Set up new rules to deduct payments to people who are obviously spending their available funds on frivolous non-essentials, and give the remainder to those people who really need it. This is free money they are getting based on a real need -- it's not an entitlement. Limit the amount of time that people can use the benefit, so that people who have 4 children don't wind up having 2 more to increase their eligibility for aid. Unless they are seriously disabled, do not give them any more free money belonging to other people; and I don't mean the type of disabled where the person can make money on the side doing small construction projects while getting paid under the table.report abuse

Show all 33 comments

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.