sponsored by
06/04/2009
enlarge
Staff photo by Joe Phelanfrom the Kennebec Journal
STATE HOUSE BALDACCI: CUT $63M MORE
Many happy returns in Richmond
Tax woes land on Whitefield
Rapist denied new trial
AUGUSTA MINDING A MINE
SPORT OF KINGS Falconry a blend of dedication and commitment
COLLEGE HOCKEY: Maine rallies but falls short against Boston College
COLLEGE ROUNDUP: Colby women win season opener at home tournament
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Kennebec Journal
from the Morning Sentinel
WEDDING BURGLAR JAILED
Youths talk Turkey Day
Plenty of free Thanksgiving meals available
Turkey prices make for a happy holiday
Kennebec County Superior Court
POLICE
COLLEGE HOCKEY: Maine rallies but falls short against Boston College
COLLEGE ROUNDUP: Colby women win season opener at home tournament
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Morning Sentinel
The Maine House overwhelmingly backed a measure Wednesday that would delay, for a year, the penalties levied on school systems that turned down state-mandated district mergers.
The cuts to those districts' state subsidies, under legislation sponsored by Rep. James Schatz, would instead take effect in the 2010-11 academic year.
The House vote was a veto-proof 111-32 in favor of the penalty delay. The measure next goes to the Senate.
Maine towns have worked hard to comply with the consolidation mandate, Schatz said, but some of them -- especially small, rural towns -- need more time to come up with workable plans.
The consolidation mandate, which legislators passed in June 2007, was an effort to combine Maine's 290 school districts into 80 by July 1. But since voters in more than 100 school districts rejected local mergers, Maine will have 218 districts on July 1.
"This is a very daunting task," said Schatz, D-Blue Hill. "Some (regional school units) had nothing to do but change the lettering on their school buses. But small schools did not."
State Department of Education officials have suggested money withheld from penalized districts could be given to newly consolidated districts to help them with one-time merger costs. They've put those plans on hold, however, until after a likely November vote on repealing the consolidation law.
Lawmakers said it's wrong to hold that money -- approximately $3.8 million -- in state coffers while schools could be using it.
"It does nothing for our schools; it does nothing for our children," said Rep. Seth Berry, D-Bowdoinham. "All it does is put pressure on our (property-tax) rates."
Those opposed to the penalty delay said voters could have chosen to back local merger plans, thereby avoiding penalties.
"The thing I heard (consolidation opponents) yelling was, 'local control, local control, local control,'" said Rep. Charles Harlow, D-Portland. "But they don't want to pay for local control."
Voters did not cast their "no" votes lightly, said Rep. Andrew O'Brien, D-Lincolnville. "In our districts, it would cost us more to reorganize than to remain separate," he said.
If the penalty delay ultimately passes, Department of Education spokesman David Connerty-Marin said, "It certainly doesn't remove (districts) from the requirement to move forward."
House members later Wednesday narrowly shot down a bill that would repeal the consolidation mandate altogether.
In a 72-70 vote, lawmakers rejected the citizen initiative for which consolidation opponents collected more than 55,000 voter signatures last year to place the measure on November's ballot.
The Senate will also take up that measure.
Its likely failure in the Legislature means legislators would have effectively opted to send the decision to voters in November.
Matthew Stone -- 623-3811,
ext. 435
mstone@centralmaine.com
Reader comments
Click here to view or add reader comments