11/12/2007
from the Kennebec Journal
Sport of Kings
New Medicaid billing system inspires doubts among some
Christmas spirit
Guidance counselor: Dismiss complaint based on criticism of same-sex marriage
CHELSEA: 'Practice burn' provides thrill for 9-year-old
Trust eyes orchard purchase
GOLFER OF THE YEAR: Bonenfant rises up Cony ranks
YOUTH SOCCER: Local team gives 'care package' to children in Afghanistan
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Kennebec Journal
from the Morning Sentinel
YES ON 1 BACKER REBUTS CLAIM
New system for Medicaid payments worries providers
After petition drive, Clinton police force budget will go a third time before voters
A rock musician makes trip home via Black Taxi
MADISON: After revaluation, abatement requests reviewed
Parks to have facelift
GOLFER OF THE YEAR: Sweet does job for Madison
YOUTH SOCCER: Local team gives 'care package' to children in Afghanistan
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Morning Sentinel
MaineToday Media, Inc.
A Portland lawyer has asked a federal court to rule against the Recording Industry Association of America, and in favor of his client, a college student from Wells.
In an answer to a civil lawsuit, Robert Mittel said the industry has no grounds to demand money from Cara Laude, and he challenged the legal tactics employed by the industry.
The RIAA sued Laude and hundreds of other students this year, in a nationwide effort to crack down on illegal filesharing on campus. Industry giants such as Sony, Warner Bros. and Capitol Records say filesharing over the Internet is hurting business.
About 35 students at Maine colleges have been sued for sharing copyrighted material. Most have settled out of court by paying between $3,000 and $5,000 to the industry. For the students who have not settled, the industry has asked for minimum judgments from the courts of $750 per shared file.
"Suing students is absolutely not our first preference," Cara Duckworth, a spokeswoman for the RIAA, said in an interview last month. "The music industry can't afford to turn a blind eye."
Mittel, of the Portland firm MittelAsen LLC, filed the answer on behalf of Laude in U.S. District Court on Thursday. He said that the industry can claim, at best, that actual damages for copyright infringement amount to 50 cents per song.
"An award of statutory damages some 1,500 or greater times the actual damages of the plaintiffs will constitute a violation of due process," Mittel wrote in the answer.
He also disagrees with the recording industry's claim that the simple act of making a music file available online is distribution under federal law. That same legal argument is under review at other courts across the country.
Mittel placed some of the blame for copyright infringement on the record companies. By continuing to sell entire records, rather than individual tracks, the industry encourages file-sharing, Mittel said. The industry also should be barred from recovering damages, he said, because it produces and markets songs glorifying theft and other criminal conduct.
The industry monitors the use of peer-to-peer programs, such as Ares or LimeWire, and captures data including Internet protocol addresses, time stamps and audio files shared. Then, industry representatives contact college administrators to report the activity, and to ask the school to forward a notification letter to the student whose computer has been flagged. Those letters include offers of settlement. None of the cases against college students have gone to trial in Maine.
If the Laude case were to reach that level, a trial would be scheduled for next summer.
Attempts to reach Mittel and Duckworth were not successful Friday.




Reader comments
Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First
1-5 of 5 comments:
It was ok 25 years ago to record a song off the radio or a movie from the TV; or how about borrow someone's cassette or vhs tape and copy it for your own personal use! The record company's seemed to have no problem with that back then--but now suddenly there's a concern?
Downloading music from the internet for personal use should not be a crime. Because copywright laws were so vague to begin with, now, at the RIAA's convenience, they can slam the little people with six figure lawsuits.
How about the article a few weeks ago about a woman who, I believe was single mom, was sued for $200,000 for $20 worth of music? So while this woman probably struggles from paycheck to paycheck, I'm sure the kids of these Big Wigs live the lap of luxury--never have to worry about Santa not coming this year, or any year for that matter.
Hell, why don't the big publishing companies just start suing people for borrowing books, or selling them at yard sales!!
Get a reality check, Nonny!!report abuse
File sharing is like permanantly borrowing something that doen't belong to you. It's a nice way of saying I stole it, because you haven't paid a dime for it. Without copyright laws creativeness looses all value and respect.report abuse
It must be nice to live in your world. I've just never met anyone who does.report abuse
In other words, in this day and age, if we spoiled brats don't get what we want when we want it (and for free), we blame others and lawlessness should be expected. What a lousy message to send young people! I think a nice, stiff fine would send a better message:)report abuse
You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.