Search Maine Yellow Pages 
Log In | Register | Help
Wind power project faces LURC
By ALAN CROWELL
Staff Writer
Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel 09/15/2007

AUGUSTA -- When the Black Nubble Wind Farm goes before the public at a three-day Land Use Regulation Commission hearing next week, it will have at least one more supporter than its predecessor.

The Black Nubble Wind Farm, which calls for 18 turbines on the western Maine mountain, will go before the public Wednesday, Thursday and Friday at the Sugarloaf Grand Summit Conference Center in Carrabassett Valley. Land Use Regulation Commission officials say the last day of the hearing may not necessary.

The Black Nubble proposal is a smaller version of the Redington wind farm proposal, which was rejected by Land Use Regulation Commission members in an unusual 6-1 vote in January that went against the recommendation of its own staff.

But while environmental groups lined up almost uniformly against the Redington project at hearings last year, the Black Nubble project has gained at least one important supporter -- the Natural Resources Council of Maine, one of the largest environmental advocacy groups in the state.

The Natural Resources Council of Maine testified against the Redington project -- which called for wind turbines on both Redington Pond Range and Black Nubble -- but advocated for a smaller, Black Nubble-only project at last year's hearings.

Black Nubble is lower in elevation and has less subalpine habitat. It is also about three miles from the Appalachian Trail -- turbines on Redington would have been about one mile from the trail at their closest point.

Last year, the project developer, Maine Mountain Power, said the Black Nubble project would not be economically viable.

Now, Maine Mountain Power said the redesigned Black Nubble project is feasible.

They have also committed to protecting Redington Pond Range from being developed for wind power.

Natural Resources Council of Maine Director of Advocacy Pete Didisheim said the Black Nubble project strikes the right balance.

"The .... really huge difference is all of the turbines have been removed from Redington," said Didisheim.

Redington is the last unprotected, undeveloped 4,000-foot peak in Maine, he said.

On top of Redington is about 760 acres of contiguous subalpine forest, and he said the mountain itself is within a 35,000-acre bloc of largely uncut forest unfragmented by roads.

Didisheim said the project would also produce more clean power than all but five of Maine's hydropower projects.

"It is a relatively small impact on the ground in return for a significant amount of clean power, and we need to reduce our dependence on fossil fuel," said Didisheim.

Not all environmental groups agree that the Black Nubble project deserves support, however.

Advocates for the Appalachian Trail say that just because the wind turbines on Black Nubble would be further from the trail, they wouldn't necessarily be less noticeable.

The lighted turbines would have a dramatic effect on the experience of hiking the Appalachian Trail in an area where there are few signs of human activity, according to trail advocates.

Mane Audubon, which supports other wind power projects in Maine, is opposed to one on Black Nubble, because it says that Black Nubble is simply the wrong place for a wind power project.

Black Nubble is part of one of Maine's premier mountain regions and features habitat for rare and declining plant and animal species, according to a Maine Audubon spokeswoman.

To truck wind turbines up the mountain and anchor them to the ridge, Maine Mountain Power will essentially have to blast off parts of the mountain, forever changing its character and values, according to Maine Audubon.

Alan Crowell -- 474-9534, Ext. 342

acrowell@centralmaine.com

Bookmark and share this story: digg del.icio.us Reddit


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

kev of wiscasset, ME
Sep 17, 2007 12:07 PM
The scaled back industrial development proposed for Black Nubble should be rejected for the same reasons as the previous proposal. The construction of new roads, the associated transmission lines that will run for nearly 25 miles, and the massive amount of blasting needed to install the towers will not "fit harmoniously into the landscape" as is required by Maine law when rezoning in the unorganized territories. LURC showed amazing foresight when they rejected the initial proposal. Hopefully they reject this last ditch effort at a poorly sited industrial development.

Rezoning is NOT a right. There are plenty of places where wind industry should be utilized in Maine... undeveloped, high mountain areas are not one of them.report abuse
Terry Tesseo of Coplin Plantation, ME
Sep 16, 2007 9:02 AM
The NRCM should change it's name to "WE don't Know Squat."If they did they'd know a wind plant will not reduce use of oil or stop any carbon emissions.Read the studies and get the facts.Our leaders want to cover the state with these things.
They will not shut down any power plants or stop any carbon emissions.Nowhere in the world has this happened.Do A little reading folks.The wind plant people can not support their claims.report abuse
DrPepper of Largo, FL
Sep 15, 2007 10:58 AM
KINDA MAKES YOU WANT TO THROW A ROCK AT A BIRD.OR ITS LOVER?report abuse
jm of Augusta, ME
Sep 15, 2007 8:17 AM
When will Maine Audubon wake up to the fact that, overall, wind projects are far less damaging to the environment than coal or oil, and far less dangerous than nuclear power?

Hopefully, LURC will get it right this time.report abuse

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.