OUT-OF-STATE DOG ADOPTIONS
Rescue groups oppose new law
By SUSAN M. COVER
Staff Writer
Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel Thursday, July 5, 2007

AUGUSTA -- Dog rescue groups that bring in animals from out of state say they are concerned about proposed new rules that would require a five-day quarantine period before an animal can be adopted.

But the state says a spate of sick dogs coming in from the South make the quarantine necessary.

Both sides will get a chance to explain their positions July 16 at a public hearing that promises to be contentious.

State Veterinarian Don Hoenig said he and others at the state Department of Agriculture have received numerous calls from vets and pet owners about adopted dogs with heartworm, which is treatable, and distemper, which is incurable and often fatal.

The proposed rules would require dogs and cats to be properly vaccinated and tested for certain diseases before they could be legally adopted in Maine. Also, the animal would be isolated for five days before the adoption could become complete.

"After Hurricane Katrina, we saw in the media these reports of dogs coming up from the South, and the efforts to rescue them are certainly laudable," Hoenig said. "But we started hearing from owners and vets about health issues."

Rescue groups, such as the Golden Retriever Rescue Lifeline Inc. in Biddeford, say they will no longer be able to save animals if the rules go through.

That's because the groups -- usually volunteer organizations that rely on donations -- have no place to keep the dogs in quarantine for five days before adoption, said Melanie Crane, co-president of the golden retriever rescue.

"I think they are unfairly targeting the wrong people," she said. "Now the good rescues will suffer for it."

Crane said her group makes sure all the dogs they bring to Maine have had their shots, and have completed a 14-day quarantine followed by time with a foster family before they are brought into the state.

"As much as you can guarantee the health of an animal, we do," she said.

She and others from rescues around the state are planning to express their opposition to the rules at the public hearing. Another vocal opponent is the Almost Home Rescue of Maine, which has dedicated the home page of its Web site to explaining why the proposed rules are unnecessary.

Other groups -- including the Kennebec Valley Shetland Sheepdog Rescue, the Second Chance Boxer Rescue and Dogs Deserve Better -- could not be reached for comment this week.

Hoenig said the state's Animal Welfare Advisory Committee has been working on the proposed rule changes for a couple of years and decided to try to make state law consistent for dogs and cats in cases of resale and adoption.

"This rule is a proposal to try to put some safeguards to protect the health of animals in Maine, the consumers from adopting animals incubating disease and the animals themselves," he said. Hoenig said he understands there's opposition to the proposed rules.

"I'm not saying this is the be all and end all of this subject," he said. "Maybe there will be new ideas that come forward at the hearing."

Susan Cover -- 623-1056

scover@centralmaine.com

Bookmark and share this story: digg del.icio.us Reddit


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

OldGal of Leeds, ME
Jul 5, 2007 8:40 PM
All of the comments are valid. It may be heartless to reject sick animals but allowing others to get sick is heartless too.report abuse
dogsledder of Farmingdale, ME
Jul 5, 2007 6:46 PM
For the sake of our animals, I think this is a good rule. Four years ago I adopted a dog from the Golden Retreiver Rescue. This guy had come up from Georgia. I was assured he had been vetted and passed with flying colors and had been quarantined before he came to Maine. I picked him up the day after he arrived into Maine from one of the local rescue people. I noticed he had a patch of dry skin on his face. I was told that the vet checked that out and it was from poor food, that he would be fine as soon as he got some proper food into him.

Then I was told that his medical papers were already in the mail to me. I never received them.

Long story short...after spending a lot of money on this guy, I find out he had never been vaccinated (My Vet did the lab work for me) and that dry skin was mange. That discovery came to late to keep my little Setter from getting it. I never received any kind of history on this guy, no medical records of any type.

Five days isn't a long time to quarantine a dog, especially if it keeps other people from going through what I went through and keeps more disease from spreading to our dogs..report abuse
J Cassesi of Waterville, ME
Jul 5, 2007 11:08 AM
Hmmmmm, seems Mainers vemon for people from "away" extends to poor, helpless animals from "away" as well.
report abuse
Cynthia Phillips of Wayne, ME
Jul 5, 2007 10:27 AM
I support the state veterinarian and DOA opinion. (This is what we pay them to do!) We went thru the Biddeford rescue, fell in love with our Katrina Rescue puppy which cost $400. Within two weeks and $350 vet bills, discovered our puppy had a terminal illness - most likely distemper. This puppy was 'screened' and 'vacinated' in Louisiana before it was shipped to Maine. We had papers galore from a vet down there that said she had all her 'required' shots and was good to go. From this litter, all puppies died. This has happened with other Rescue outfits in Maine also.
Quarantine here in Maine is the only answer in my opinion, having lived the nightmare personally. Not only to save the expense of pouring money into a pup that may not survive, but also to save the heart break of loosing a puppy you have bonded with so quickly .....report abuse

Show all 11 comments

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.