Tuesday, May 22, 2007
from the Kennebec Journal
Sport of Kings
New Medicaid billing system inspires doubts among some
Christmas spirit
Guidance counselor: Dismiss complaint based on criticism of same-sex marriage
CHELSEA: 'Practice burn' provides thrill for 9-year-old
Trust eyes orchard purchase
GOLFER OF THE YEAR: Bonenfant rises up Cony ranks
YOUTH SOCCER: Local team gives 'care package' to children in Afghanistan
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Kennebec Journal
from the Morning Sentinel
YES ON 1 BACKER REBUTS CLAIM
New system for Medicaid payments worries providers
After petition drive, Clinton police force budget will go a third time before voters
A rock musician makes trip home via Black Taxi
MADISON: After revaluation, abatement requests reviewed
Parks to have facelift
GOLFER OF THE YEAR: Sweet does job for Madison
YOUTH SOCCER: Local team gives 'care package' to children in Afghanistan
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Morning Sentinel
Staff Writer
Four-thousand students. Nine towns. Four high schools.
One superintendent.
That's the latest school district consolidation plan, released Monday afternoon, facing residents of Manchester, Mount Vernon, Monmouth, Fayette, Readfield, Wayne, Winthrop, Farmingdale and Hallowell.
Under the most recent plan, those towns would join to created RSU 30 -- a consolidated school district of about 4,000 students.
The plan would mean that, of five school superintendents governing those towns now, one -- or none -- could have a job with RSU 30.
"We already have alliances with all of the schools in the proposed district," said Richard Abramson, superintendent for Maranacook Area Schools, one of five administrators who could compete for the position of RSU 30 superintendent.
Abramson said he wasn't entirely surprised by the proposed district: "If you look at the geography, it's contiguous."
As for there being only one superintendent where there are now five, Abramson said he and his colleagues may wind up doing different jobs in the proposed new school district.
"These are all friends and we all -- I think -- have contracts beyond the consolidation timelines, but I don't know what will happen to those contracts," he said. "I think it's still too early to tell. We have talked about this -- that we all have specialties that we bring to the table. So maybe this is an opportunity for having a transition period to make things work well before you go down to one superintendent."
The other four superintendents affected by the potential new district did not return phone calls seeking comment Monday.
In the past few months, school officials in Readfield, Fayette, Mount Vernon, Wayne, Manchester, Monmouth, Winthrop, Turner, Livermore Falls, Jay, Hallowell and Farmingdale had begun to examine possible consolidation partners in an effort to find cost efficiencies prior to a state-set deadline.
The latest legislative plan, released Monday by Senate Majority Leader Elizabeth Mitchell, D-Vassalboro, sets different rules for rural and urban districts while achieving the $36.5 million in savings mandated in Democratic Gov. John Baldacci's budget proposal.
Under Mitchell's plan, York, Cumberland, Androscoggin, Kennebec, Sagadahoc and Knox counties would be required to achieve a minimum student population of 2,500. But other rural areas wouldn't be required to meet that standard -- along with island and tribal schools.
While the state Department of Education released a map that shows how the number of districts could be reduced from 290 to 62 if most districts had a minimum of 2,500 students, Mitchell's proposal -- put together by a working group that included lawmakers and interested parties -- sets a goal of 80 or fewer districts.
Baldacci originally proposed reducing the number of districts to 26.
The Mitchell proposal would require all districts to vote on school district consolidation in January 2008, and to implement the consolidation by July 1 of that year. School districts voting not to consolidate would face "serious financial penalties," though those penalties are yet unspecified.
Elizabeth Comeau -- 623-3811, Ext. 433
ecomeau@centralmaine.com

Reader comments
Sort by: Oldest First | Newest first
This action may indeed move us in a positive direction with regard to the financial siphon schools have become within our communities. Lets all hope for the best.
The greater problem, the infection of less than quality employees within each individual school system will have to be addressed separately. Time has seen teachers deteriorate from the once held pillar of society, an individual trusted to guide and develop our families most cherished possession, our children. To a manipulating, self indulging, group of educators, seeking one thing more than all others, the next step raise. In that effort, if they must put up with children, so be it.
While we can all identify exceptions to the rule, they are certainly far too few in this modern world of education. Those exceptions, respected educators, would thrive in a well implemented voucher system. Schools would by necessity search for those individuals. The laws of supply and demand would then govern and police our educators for us. The better schools would attract better educators and therefore provide better education to our children. The schools and teachers that failed to excel in a voucher system would finally get what they deserve, the next step, unemployment.
Think about it,
report abuse
report abuse
Show all 8 comments
You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.