Superintendents try to plan for expected consolidation
By ELIZABETH COMEAU
Staff Writer
Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel Tuesday, May 22, 2007

By ELIZABETH COMEAU

Staff Writer

Four-thousand students. Nine towns. Four high schools.

One superintendent.

That's the latest school district consolidation plan, released Monday afternoon, facing residents of Manchester, Mount Vernon, Monmouth, Fayette, Readfield, Wayne, Winthrop, Farmingdale and Hallowell.

Under the most recent plan, those towns would join to created RSU 30 -- a consolidated school district of about 4,000 students.

The plan would mean that, of five school superintendents governing those towns now, one -- or none -- could have a job with RSU 30.

"We already have alliances with all of the schools in the proposed district," said Richard Abramson, superintendent for Maranacook Area Schools, one of five administrators who could compete for the position of RSU 30 superintendent.

Abramson said he wasn't entirely surprised by the proposed district: "If you look at the geography, it's contiguous."

As for there being only one superintendent where there are now five, Abramson said he and his colleagues may wind up doing different jobs in the proposed new school district.

"These are all friends and we all -- I think -- have contracts beyond the consolidation timelines, but I don't know what will happen to those contracts," he said. "I think it's still too early to tell. We have talked about this -- that we all have specialties that we bring to the table. So maybe this is an opportunity for having a transition period to make things work well before you go down to one superintendent."

The other four superintendents affected by the potential new district did not return phone calls seeking comment Monday.

In the past few months, school officials in Readfield, Fayette, Mount Vernon, Wayne, Manchester, Monmouth, Winthrop, Turner, Livermore Falls, Jay, Hallowell and Farmingdale had begun to examine possible consolidation partners in an effort to find cost efficiencies prior to a state-set deadline.

The latest legislative plan, released Monday by Senate Majority Leader Elizabeth Mitchell, D-Vassalboro, sets different rules for rural and urban districts while achieving the $36.5 million in savings mandated in Democratic Gov. John Baldacci's budget proposal.

Under Mitchell's plan, York, Cumberland, Androscoggin, Kennebec, Sagadahoc and Knox counties would be required to achieve a minimum student population of 2,500. But other rural areas wouldn't be required to meet that standard -- along with island and tribal schools.

While the state Department of Education released a map that shows how the number of districts could be reduced from 290 to 62 if most districts had a minimum of 2,500 students, Mitchell's proposal -- put together by a working group that included lawmakers and interested parties -- sets a goal of 80 or fewer districts.

Baldacci originally proposed reducing the number of districts to 26.

The Mitchell proposal would require all districts to vote on school district consolidation in January 2008, and to implement the consolidation by July 1 of that year. School districts voting not to consolidate would face "serious financial penalties," though those penalties are yet unspecified.

Elizabeth Comeau -- 623-3811, Ext. 433

ecomeau@centralmaine.com


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest First | Newest first

TigersEye of Gardiner, ME
May 22, 2007 7:35 AM
At least they finally are doing something. While I believe the restructuring of school systems will fall short of its goal in Maine, I must give credit where credit is due.
This action may indeed move us in a positive direction with regard to the financial siphon schools have become within our communities. Lets all hope for the best.

The greater problem, the infection of less than quality employees within each individual school system will have to be addressed separately. Time has seen teachers deteriorate from the once held pillar of society, an individual trusted to guide and develop our families most cherished possession, our children. To a manipulating, self indulging, group of educators, seeking one thing more than all others, the next step raise. In that effort, if they must put up with children, so be it.

While we can all identify exceptions to the rule, they are certainly far too few in this modern world of education. Those exceptions, respected educators, would thrive in a well implemented voucher system. Schools would by necessity search for those individuals. The laws of supply and demand would then govern and police our educators for us. The better schools would attract better educators and therefore provide better education to our children. The schools and teachers that failed to excel in a voucher system would finally get what they deserve, the next step, unemployment.

Think about it,
report abuse
Wayne Ladner of Richmond, ME
May 22, 2007 7:59 AM
Thank you Libby Mitchell for restoring some sanity to the original impossible proposal. This sounds much more workable. Keep up the good work and 'welcome back!'.

report abuse
Bob Smith of Orlando, FL
May 22, 2007 9:05 AM
It's ridiclous. I live in Farmingdale. My kids went to Hall Dale. It may cost a little more but the educational experience that they had-the opportunity to participate in sports, music- band and plays allowed both of them to have a great high scool. If they had commuted an hour each way and been in a much larger school would they have had those opportunities ? We know only the exceptional get recognized. report abuse
Hermann Munster of AmishLand, PA
May 22, 2007 9:26 AM
The proposed consolidation is a stupid idea. Many of the areas are too large geographically to consolidate. Maine is going to be very sorry it chose this course of action - all in pursuit of the almighty dollar instead of focusing on the educational purposes of public schools.report abuse

Show all 8 comments

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.