Search Maine Yellow Pages 
Log In | Register | Help
Superintendents try to plan for expected consolidation
By ELIZABETH COMEAU
Staff Writer
Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel Tuesday, May 22, 2007

By ELIZABETH COMEAU

Staff Writer

Four-thousand students. Nine towns. Four high schools.

One superintendent.

That's the latest school district consolidation plan, released Monday afternoon, facing residents of Manchester, Mount Vernon, Monmouth, Fayette, Readfield, Wayne, Winthrop, Farmingdale and Hallowell.

Under the most recent plan, those towns would join to created RSU 30 -- a consolidated school district of about 4,000 students.

The plan would mean that, of five school superintendents governing those towns now, one -- or none -- could have a job with RSU 30.

"We already have alliances with all of the schools in the proposed district," said Richard Abramson, superintendent for Maranacook Area Schools, one of five administrators who could compete for the position of RSU 30 superintendent.

Abramson said he wasn't entirely surprised by the proposed district: "If you look at the geography, it's contiguous."

As for there being only one superintendent where there are now five, Abramson said he and his colleagues may wind up doing different jobs in the proposed new school district.

"These are all friends and we all -- I think -- have contracts beyond the consolidation timelines, but I don't know what will happen to those contracts," he said. "I think it's still too early to tell. We have talked about this -- that we all have specialties that we bring to the table. So maybe this is an opportunity for having a transition period to make things work well before you go down to one superintendent."

The other four superintendents affected by the potential new district did not return phone calls seeking comment Monday.

In the past few months, school officials in Readfield, Fayette, Mount Vernon, Wayne, Manchester, Monmouth, Winthrop, Turner, Livermore Falls, Jay, Hallowell and Farmingdale had begun to examine possible consolidation partners in an effort to find cost efficiencies prior to a state-set deadline.

The latest legislative plan, released Monday by Senate Majority Leader Elizabeth Mitchell, D-Vassalboro, sets different rules for rural and urban districts while achieving the $36.5 million in savings mandated in Democratic Gov. John Baldacci's budget proposal.

Under Mitchell's plan, York, Cumberland, Androscoggin, Kennebec, Sagadahoc and Knox counties would be required to achieve a minimum student population of 2,500. But other rural areas wouldn't be required to meet that standard -- along with island and tribal schools.

While the state Department of Education released a map that shows how the number of districts could be reduced from 290 to 62 if most districts had a minimum of 2,500 students, Mitchell's proposal -- put together by a working group that included lawmakers and interested parties -- sets a goal of 80 or fewer districts.

Baldacci originally proposed reducing the number of districts to 26.

The Mitchell proposal would require all districts to vote on school district consolidation in January 2008, and to implement the consolidation by July 1 of that year. School districts voting not to consolidate would face "serious financial penalties," though those penalties are yet unspecified.

Elizabeth Comeau -- 623-3811, Ext. 433

ecomeau@centralmaine.com


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

Taxpayer of Livermore, ME
May 23, 2007 9:41 AM
If the goal of consolidation is to save money while improving local education (or at least not make things worse), the governor and legislature would do well to provide a SOUND analysis of the following:

1. How the average Mainer's income tax bill be reduced;

2. How the average Mainer's property tax bill will be reduced; and

3. How bureaucracy in the Department of Education will be trimmed to reflect a reduction in the number of districts.

In my mind, the Mitchell proposal is little more than a massaging of the Baldacci plan, which itself is a shift of state funds away from education and toward other bloated, bureaucracy-supported, special interest boondoggles that we Mainers cannot afford. Well run school districts have their feet to the fire for every dime they spend while the Medicaid computer system (just one example) continues to bleed green. This makes no sense.

Locally, our district (MSAD 36) is a model of efficiency. Over the past few years, educational opportunities have improved while the tax burden has shrunk. Our cost-per-pupil is lower than any of our neighbors. If the Mitchell/Baldacci plan passes, local taxes have nowhere to go but up in the lower cost districts that are forced to merge with higher-cost neighbors.

Let's see a district-by-district analysis. If the taxpayer savings isn't there, scrap the plan.report abuse
George Crawford of Harrington, ME
May 22, 2007 5:44 PM
The new layers of middle mangaemetn that woudl be created under these large districts also has to be explored. The same work still has to be done but on a larger scale. Your new district may have not just a Superintendent but also and Assistant Superintendent to handle the greater load of administration. A curriculum coordinator if you already don't have one. More bookeepers, secretaries, and other staff.
The point is that combining districts administratively may save some money but not as much as people think it will. The bueracratic rate of growth may slow down but it will be more expensive in a few years as educational mandates grow.
The state should consider having an independent commision look at educational mandates of the state and their cost. They should have to be proved to be beenficial to education, doable, and cost effective. The mandates should also be specific and clear. Maine has had many unclear mandates such as the Comprehensive Assesment System that was a good concept and was like trying to hit a moving target in the dark. Nobody knew exactly what it was supposed to look like. It was eventually withdrawn.
Teacher spent many summers, workshop days, and other time trying to achieve it. But it was unclear what it was supposed to be.
The consoldiation proposal should leave the state in a supporting role and not a domineering one. It should also be clear it what it wants to accomplish and leave decisions to local schools and school boards. report abuse
ZewC of Winthrop, ME
May 22, 2007 10:52 AM
One really has to wonder if this is the way to go. I know superintendents in many districts make a great deal of money and sure cutting down on the number of administrators will save some money. I don't think anyone likes the threat of losing their job, and it seems as though these superintendents are working together to find a way for all of them to stay on in the new regional district in some capacity. Will they take a significant pay cut? It seems to me if they all remain that the personnel costs will remain the same.
We need to make sure the students don't lose out and suffer because of this!
I wonder how much money the state is spending to attempt to implement this?report abuse
Snow of fairtown, ME
May 22, 2007 9:43 AM
This is nonesense....cut education for our children, while taxing their parents and grandparents to death. Good ole Maine and all of their democratic comrads!-
More money for the Capitol to waste away with, oh say for one; their "absolute" Martini parties. Damn, where's money for the lime's going to come from? oh,of course from ciggie's taxed more.
I guess they (statehouse) forgot to tax alcohol...ha-would interfer with their "good times."
Maine's new logo - "come and get it while you can." Cus it sure isn't going to be long before mainer's all start leaving this state. We've lost most of our children for a better live in other states and it's becoming more and more a domino effect. Great Job Maine--Democrat's
I think I should get a raise today-wonder if the boss will agree?report abuse

Show all 8 comments

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.