Tuesday, May 22, 2007
from the Kennebec Journal
CENTRAL MAINE As some local charities suffer, focus turning to Planet Aid
UNITED AGAINST FORESTRY CUTS
Exact change lanes disappearing
Scrutiny of police shootings urged
MANCHESTER RECYCLING THE EASY WAY
Winthrop invites residents to 'vision'
GIRLS BASKETBALL NOTEBOOK: Cony looking for finishing touch
Patriots done? How?
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Kennebec Journal
from the Morning Sentinel
A tireless chronicler of a town's heritage
SKOWHEGAN TRAFFIC HEARING TODAY
Use of deadly force by police under scrutiny
Forest service cuts under fire
Gogan gets six months in jail
Farmington man guilty of threat
Patriots done? How?
GIRLS BASKETBALL NOTEBOOK: Road trip paying dividends for Eagles
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Morning Sentinel
Staff Writer
Four-thousand students. Nine towns. Four high schools.
One superintendent.
That's the latest school district consolidation plan, released Monday afternoon, facing residents of Manchester, Mount Vernon, Monmouth, Fayette, Readfield, Wayne, Winthrop, Farmingdale and Hallowell.
Under the most recent plan, those towns would join to created RSU 30 -- a consolidated school district of about 4,000 students.
The plan would mean that, of five school superintendents governing those towns now, one -- or none -- could have a job with RSU 30.
"We already have alliances with all of the schools in the proposed district," said Richard Abramson, superintendent for Maranacook Area Schools, one of five administrators who could compete for the position of RSU 30 superintendent.
Abramson said he wasn't entirely surprised by the proposed district: "If you look at the geography, it's contiguous."
As for there being only one superintendent where there are now five, Abramson said he and his colleagues may wind up doing different jobs in the proposed new school district.
"These are all friends and we all -- I think -- have contracts beyond the consolidation timelines, but I don't know what will happen to those contracts," he said. "I think it's still too early to tell. We have talked about this -- that we all have specialties that we bring to the table. So maybe this is an opportunity for having a transition period to make things work well before you go down to one superintendent."
The other four superintendents affected by the potential new district did not return phone calls seeking comment Monday.
In the past few months, school officials in Readfield, Fayette, Mount Vernon, Wayne, Manchester, Monmouth, Winthrop, Turner, Livermore Falls, Jay, Hallowell and Farmingdale had begun to examine possible consolidation partners in an effort to find cost efficiencies prior to a state-set deadline.
The latest legislative plan, released Monday by Senate Majority Leader Elizabeth Mitchell, D-Vassalboro, sets different rules for rural and urban districts while achieving the $36.5 million in savings mandated in Democratic Gov. John Baldacci's budget proposal.
Under Mitchell's plan, York, Cumberland, Androscoggin, Kennebec, Sagadahoc and Knox counties would be required to achieve a minimum student population of 2,500. But other rural areas wouldn't be required to meet that standard -- along with island and tribal schools.
While the state Department of Education released a map that shows how the number of districts could be reduced from 290 to 62 if most districts had a minimum of 2,500 students, Mitchell's proposal -- put together by a working group that included lawmakers and interested parties -- sets a goal of 80 or fewer districts.
Baldacci originally proposed reducing the number of districts to 26.
The Mitchell proposal would require all districts to vote on school district consolidation in January 2008, and to implement the consolidation by July 1 of that year. School districts voting not to consolidate would face "serious financial penalties," though those penalties are yet unspecified.
Elizabeth Comeau -- 623-3811, Ext. 433
ecomeau@centralmaine.com

Reader comments
Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First
1. How the average Mainer's income tax bill be reduced;
2. How the average Mainer's property tax bill will be reduced; and
3. How bureaucracy in the Department of Education will be trimmed to reflect a reduction in the number of districts.
In my mind, the Mitchell proposal is little more than a massaging of the Baldacci plan, which itself is a shift of state funds away from education and toward other bloated, bureaucracy-supported, special interest boondoggles that we Mainers cannot afford. Well run school districts have their feet to the fire for every dime they spend while the Medicaid computer system (just one example) continues to bleed green. This makes no sense.
Locally, our district (MSAD 36) is a model of efficiency. Over the past few years, educational opportunities have improved while the tax burden has shrunk. Our cost-per-pupil is lower than any of our neighbors. If the Mitchell/Baldacci plan passes, local taxes have nowhere to go but up in the lower cost districts that are forced to merge with higher-cost neighbors.
Let's see a district-by-district analysis. If the taxpayer savings isn't there, scrap the plan.report abuse
The point is that combining districts administratively may save some money but not as much as people think it will. The bueracratic rate of growth may slow down but it will be more expensive in a few years as educational mandates grow.
The state should consider having an independent commision look at educational mandates of the state and their cost. They should have to be proved to be beenficial to education, doable, and cost effective. The mandates should also be specific and clear. Maine has had many unclear mandates such as the Comprehensive Assesment System that was a good concept and was like trying to hit a moving target in the dark. Nobody knew exactly what it was supposed to look like. It was eventually withdrawn.
Teacher spent many summers, workshop days, and other time trying to achieve it. But it was unclear what it was supposed to be.
The consoldiation proposal should leave the state in a supporting role and not a domineering one. It should also be clear it what it wants to accomplish and leave decisions to local schools and school boards. report abuse
We need to make sure the students don't lose out and suffer because of this!
I wonder how much money the state is spending to attempt to implement this?report abuse
More money for the Capitol to waste away with, oh say for one; their "absolute" Martini parties. Damn, where's money for the lime's going to come from? oh,of course from ciggie's taxed more.
I guess they (statehouse) forgot to tax alcohol...ha-would interfer with their "good times."
Maine's new logo - "come and get it while you can." Cus it sure isn't going to be long before mainer's all start leaving this state. We've lost most of our children for a better live in other states and it's becoming more and more a domino effect. Great Job Maine--Democrat's
I think I should get a raise today-wonder if the boss will agree?report abuse
Show all 8 comments
You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.