mostlysunny Local forecast
Mid 50s
MaineToday.com
Log In   Register Helpdownarrow
Kennebec Journal and Morning Sentinel Kennebec Journal Morning Sentinel
Be pious, drive a Prius
Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel Saturday, May 05, 2007

Our Toyota salesman turned off the dashboard computer screen at the end of his demonstration.

"You don't want to get obsessed watching that while you're driving," he said.

C'mon. Every new Prius owner must know exactly how much gasoline she is using at every minute!

I am here to report that the thrill of seeing the bar graph consumption monitor jump to 100 mpg lasts far longer than the new-car smell.

After a year of researching, debating and crunching numbers, my husband, Paul, and I decided to buy a hybrid.

We certainly had fuel economy on our minds, but if that had been the only factor, we could have purchased a subcompact gas-sipper for a little more than half the price.

We were also influenced by the fact that, as a Toyota brochure states, the Prius generates "70 percent fewer smog-forming emissions than the average new vehicle."

Friends and family members have been surprised by our choice -- and curious about the car.

Hybrids are still a rarity -- only 0.29 percent of the vehicles on the road use its combination of gasoline and electricity as propellant.

I do feel like I am driving something very different than I've ever driven before.

The car starts with the push of a button.

When it is stopped in traffic, the gas engine turns off automatically.

All is silent. I find it eerie, but satisfying.

I could even use a drive-through -- if I wanted to.

Then there's that fascinating computer screen. It monitors the car's current miles per gallon as well the gas usage over various periods of time up to a half an hour. It also displays the average mileage.

The instant readout often hits 100 mpg, usually when the car is going downhill. A typical average is 45 to 50 mpg.

Of course, we are fixated on the mileage because we want to justify our purchase.

But we've never cared so much before.

Paul and I are both veterans of the 1970s oil crises and had owned a succession of Toyotas before we bought a Dodge minivan in 1997. Gas was $1.37 a gallon at that time.

We squirmed at the thought of relinquishing our 30-mpg Corolla for a vehicle that was lucky to get 20 mpg. But the low gas prices enabled us to make a decision based on our cargo needs rather than fuel economy.

This time, we didn't give space much thought. If we need to haul stuff, we'll rent. The national average gas price is over $3, and poised to soar. Our planet is in trouble. We are fighting a war for oil. In the end, I could justify no other choice.

I am not resting on my laurels because I am a Prius owner. Many days, it sits in the driveway as I hoof it to work. It is stocked with cloth shopping bags since I learned that 12 million barrels of oil go into making the plastic carriers Americans use each year.

I know I could do even better and not have a car at all. But for now, this car represents my best effort.

I am saving fuel, but I'm also wasting it.

It's not a pretty sight -- yet I can't take my eyes from that screen.

Liz Soares is a freelance writer and the author of "All for Maine: The Story of Gov. Percival P. Baxter." She welcomes e-mail at Baxter24@aol.com.


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

sweetguy of gardiner, ME
May 5, 2007 11:08 PM
briang relies way too much on this CNW study, which represents a very unorthodox view of the environmental impact of cars. For one thing, they assumed that a Prius would be driven only one third as many miles as other cars and then use that assumption to make it appear that each mile is three times more costly than other cars. Obviously, the car has an even lower environmental impact when it is not being driven, so that methodology is counter-intuitive to say the least. Second, that study assumes most of the environmental impact is in manufacture and shipping, while the mainstream view is that fuel economy and other costs of actual driving represents the vast majority of the energy and environmental impact. Liz Soares is right -- get a Prius.report abuse
nell of jay, ME
May 5, 2007 5:51 PM
I have driven a Prius for the past two years. I had driven GMC Jimmy's for 12 years and loved the 4x4 but not the 18 MPH as I was retiring. After much research, my husband and I decided to buy a Prius, thinking that if we didn't like it we could sell it and go back to the suv. We have never looked back and when the time comes to replace it we will certainly get another one. We get 50 + mph and the ride is no different than in a car. For you Hummer drivers, you can justify anything if you try hard enough. I would imagine that you can't dive all week and fill up for the same cost as a Prius driver. To each his own. The screen on the dash is not the reason I drive a Prius.report abuse
CraigV of Raymond, CA
May 5, 2007 4:41 PM
The CNW Marketing report quoted briang of Vassalboro is marketing trash and has been debunked numerous times since it first appeared a couple of months ago.

The battery environmental effect they quote is based on 20-year old mining practices corrected long before the first Prius was ever sold.

The 100,000 mile lifetime they quote is pure bunk. My 2003 Prius has 95,000 miles on it with no sign of decreasing performance or mpg (I regularly get over 50 mpg). All I do is change its oil every 7500 miles and drive gently. Prius taxis are reported to be at 250,000 miles and going strong on their original battery.

I am still on my original brake pads. The Synergy Drive involves no clutch or shifting gears to wear out. This is first-class Toyota engineering we're talking about.

It is amazing how easily stories full of bunk can be planted and propagated.report abuse
John of Camden, ME
May 5, 2007 10:32 AM
I wouldn't want to be in a dinkly li'l Scion when it gets side-swiped by Prosper's Dodge Magnum.report abuse

Show all 5 comments

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.