Search Maine Yellow Pages 
Log In | Register | Help
Gendron: This plan state's best approach
By KEITH EDWARDS
Staff Writer
Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel Wednesday, March 14, 2007

AUGUSTA -- Education Commissioner Susan Gendron said it's not as if she and Gov. John Baldacci didn't consider a more collaborative approach -- such as the one offered by the Education Committee -- to cutting Maine's climbing education costs.

They did. And they rejected it, deciding that leaving it up to school districts to decide whether they should consolidate with each other wouldn't guarantee real savings fast enough, if at all.

Gendron told the Appropriations Committee on Tuesday that, if cuts can't be found in administration and other noninstructional areas, the price for the rising cost of education could be paid by Maine's children, in the classroom.

"We looked at collaboration but chose to recommend consolidation," Gendron said in a briefing to the Appropriations Committee. "We believe that is the right direction to go to achieve sustainability for the long term.

"My concern is, if we don't address the noninstructional components, it starts to erode the instructional program. I'm concerned about the impact on the child in the classroom."

Last week, the Education Committee presented a plan to force Maine school districts to collaborate with each other to find ways to save funds. After a year of collaboration, districts with less than 1,200 students would be expected to consolidate with other districts to reach at least that size. However, consolidating with other districts would have to be approved by local voters.

Education Committee members believe their plan could save $36.5 million a year. Skeptics have questioned that sum.

Gendron said that there is no way to know exactly how many schools would consolidate -- or how much money that would save -- but noted that local voters, who would have to approve the consolidations, are often reluctant to approve mergers of their school systems with others.

That's why, she said, the governor's plan makes consolidation mandatory. Baldacci's plan would force Maine's 290 school districts to consolidate to just 26 by next year.

David L. Silvernail, director of the Maine Education Policy Research Institute at the University of Southern Maine, said although there are not very many studies of school consolidation savings, the studies he found indicate consolidation could save between 7 and 9 percent of expenditures.

A study of Maine school systems conducted by Silvernail's office in 2004 found the most efficient Maine schools had 2,500 to 3,000 students.

The Education Committee, earlier in its deliberations, initially suggested setting a minimum school district size of 2,500 but changed that level to 1,200 in its final report.

One thing Gendron and Appropriations Committee members agreed on Tuesday: Maine's current educational system -- with declining student enrollments and increasing numbers of administrators -- is not sustainable.

"At some point, if we don't get people to put their special interests aside, we're going to start hurting our children," said Committee Co-chairman Rep. Jeremy Fischer, D-Presque Isle. "Efficiency has to come from somewhere."

Keith Edwards -- 621-5647

kedwards@centralmaine.com


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

George Crawford of Harrington, ME
Mar 14, 2007 6:50 PM
Incentives for consolidation are not a bad idea but forced consolidation isn't. The minimum size of districts of 2500 students will not work in large rural areas such as Washington or Aroostook County because of the geography.
Collaboration will save money if the state sets requirements on the amount. Schools need to work together to share expenses and lower costs but forced consolidation without an effective plan construct the new districts will leave us in a very bad position.
Schools are working together to save money and are beginning collaboration in many areas of the state. Local control and local decisionmaking are important in Maine. We don't need to have a bigger government with less of a voice of the people. report abuse
observer1 of windham, ME
Mar 14, 2007 1:08 PM
The major opposition to the Baldacci plan consists of those whose jobs are threatend. These Superentindents and other administrative personnel have been eating at the public trough so long that they feel they have a right to our tax dollars. This plan will reduce my property taxes and continue to provide adaquate education to students. When you hear opposition to the plan, ask who is speaking and who they are speaking for.
These same people told us not to vote for the tax cap, they would reduce taxes. They didn't. They told us not to vote for TABOR, and they would reduce taxes. They now oppose this measure that would reduce taxes by cutting fat and bloat that exists in every school district. These people may be respected members of our communities, but, they are not telling us the truth. Don't fall for the deceptions again. Let your legislator know that you support the Baldacci plan.report abuse
Barney Google of Gorham, ME
Mar 14, 2007 8:15 AM
What is missing from this article is any reporting on what efficency in any school system really consists of. Certainly there is probably an optimal size, both in terms of physical plant and geography. If this is true, then we should try to give some incentive to districts to consolidate to that model. If there is no incentive why do it? My school board will approve another 5-6% increase in budget this year no problem. Fewer kids, more classroom space, more diversity in curiculm, everybody is happy. The only way efficiency will evolve from this model is that taxpayers show up to demand less.report abuse

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.