Bill would let unwed partners miss work
By SUSAN M. COVER
Staff Writer
Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel Tuesday, February 27, 2007

AUGUSTA -- Sandra Osterby's life took an unexpected turn in 2004 when her partner of more than 20 years was diagnosed with lung cancer.

Osterby, a state employee, wanted time to care for Donna Curtis, who needed chemotherapy and radiation treatments. Osterby asked for a demotion to a less demanding position in the Workers Compensation Bureau, and used her personal vacation time to be at Curtis's bedside.

When Osterby ran out of vacation and sick time, co-workers donated some of their time so she could continue to miss work.

"If it weren't for the fact that people donated vacation time, I would have been between a rock and hard place for job security," said Osterby, a 47-year-old who lives in Hermon and works in Bangor.

For married couples, the state's Family Medical Leave Law allows for 10 weeks of unpaid time to care for a sick spouse. But it doesn't apply to unmarried heterosexual couples or gay and lesbian couples.

Eventually, the state changed its policy so gay and lesbian state workers would qualify for family medical leave for domestic partners. But the change came too late for Osterby. Curtis died in August 2005, just weeks after the state changed its policy.

To help others who may find themselves in this situation, Osterby plans to testify in front of a legislative committee on Wednesday in support of a bill that extends the state Family Medical Leave Law to unmarried domestic partners. It would require all businesses with more than 15 employees, including the state, to grant the same family medical leave to married and unmarried couples.

The bill, which will be considered by the Labor Committee, would apply to those who meet the definition of a domestic partner. The definition includes five criteria, two of which are living together for at least 12 months and having joint financial arrangements.

In addition, the bill would allow for leave to care for the partner's child, or for the birth or adoption of a partner's child, said Betsy Smith, executive director of EqualityMaine, the state's largest gay and lesbian lobbying group.

The Christian Civic League of Maine, which often opposes the extension of additional rights to gays and lesbians, did not return repeated phone calls seeking comment on Monday.

The Maine State Chamber of Commerce, with 5,000 business members across the state, plans to testify in support of the bill, said spokesman Peter Gore.

"In conversations with employers, they don't think there would be a problem," he said.

A mix of large and medium-sized employers have told Gore they already allow the same leave time for unmarried couples, he said.

The bill is sponsored by Sen. Dennis Damon, D-Trenton. Co-sponsor, Rep. Janet Mills, D-Farmington, said the bill would help unmarried heterosexual couples and nontraditional families, as well as gays and lesbians.

"If you have a serious family emergency, you should be encouraged to take care of your loved one, whether it's an aunt, uncle, girlfriend or boyfriend," she said.

Smith, of EqualityMaine, said family leave is something heterosexual couples get through marriage.

"The system to use is marriage," she said.

"That's not going to happen right now in Maine. This is one of the protections we can provide."

Osterby, who raised three children with Curtis, said their family went through all the same ups and downs as any other family.

"It all boils down to all people deserve to have the same rights, especially when you are talking about life and death," she said.

Susan Cover -- 623-1056

scover@centralmaine.com


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

previous page | next page1-10 of 27 comments:

MikeH of Litchfield, ME
Feb 28, 2007 12:10 PM
Wow, the intelligence (and spelling) of some of the comments here are right at the single celled organism level. Honestly, if you don't have a comment that was inspired by at least a hint of intelligence please don't comment. You make our State look stupid. Also, learn how to use spell check.report abuse
Willie of Belgrade, ME
Feb 27, 2007 8:52 PM
I througt the people that was elected was to work on lowing the taxes. So far I havn't seen anything on that yet but have seen way too many BS bills being talk about. Maine Grovement Get with the program. My wallet is getting pretty dry.report abuse
tiredtaxpaye of central, ME
Feb 27, 2007 6:42 PM
another anti-business move .welcome to Maine where most businesses leave or close....keep electing liberals folksreport abuse
Mike Stevens of Portland, ME
Feb 27, 2007 6:11 PM
Brian Kaufman “Any business owners who believe that training an interim replacement costs more than retaining an unhappy employee struggling to meet the demands of urgent family care, they ought to brush up on some industrial psychology. Dissatisfied workers can cost you far more than training interim replacements. Loyalty and respect beget loyalty and respect.”

Brian, if you’re confident that your assertion is correct let the market sort it out don’t have the government mandate it. The enlightened companies will thrive while the heartless unenlightened companies will wither away. The heartless companies don’t deserve the benefit of you infinite wisdom. It’s called capitalism.
Socialist always know what’s best for business.
report abuse
Jennifer Curran of Falmouth, ME
Feb 27, 2007 3:55 PM
Listen Jim...

The scoop is that straight married couples can utilize this benefit to take care of sick spouses. Since those same benefits cannot be used for those who have partners....it just is not fair. I would think business would want to offer good benefits...they typically bring better employees.report abuse
America1st of Waterville, ME
Feb 27, 2007 3:15 PM
To Tom: If it's 'unpaid time' how do people live? On welfare for that period? Foodstamps? Then the taxpayers are paying for this, if it's an unpaid 'benefit' as people must eat and have shelter in order to live. Last I knew, at least one member of a marriage worked to put roofs over heads.

These women raised three children, but those children did not come as a result of their intimacy...but from a heterosexual relationship for one of them, or via adoption. Same sex unions can't create life between them.

I remain adamant that there's much to be said for and about that...I am sorry that her friend was ill and passed away...that is difficult for anyone who loves any friend. I understand that.

But, I am too old and far too conservative to be beguiled by liberal lawmakers and forced into accepting what I feel is physically unnatural. Too many of 'us' are not heard from, as it's become politically incorrect to have this opinion and disagree with the laws now being forced upon heterosexuals by those terming themselves politically correct in the name of equality.

Call me whatever you wish...I don't 'hate'...I just don't find it natural at all, and even when it's deemed legal for them to marry, I cannot become 'correct enough' to morally condone this 'right' to be whatever is now the newest correct terminology for it.

If it can't procreate, it's an unnatural nature.
Marriage is between a man and a woman. Has been that way forever.

There are ever so many out there who believe as I do...but don't state this opinion for fear of being called prejudiced and far more.

I would certainly expect the liberal newspapers to be at the forefront of waging this battle to make any type of sexual preference 'legal...' in any way possible. Marriage is marriage...and humans of opposite sexes fit together the right way by virtue of their natural physique.

To each their own opinion and the right to state it.


report abuse
AC of SoPortland, ME
Feb 27, 2007 3:13 PM
Jim- It's not "Special Treatment", rather "Equal Treatment" that this will provide.
The bill would not change a single thing about the way that you live your life. It will simply make life a little easier for a whole lot of other people. The bill would not impact me in any way either... I see no problem with it.report abuse
Citizen27B of Farmington, ME
Feb 27, 2007 2:52 PM
Jim is wrong when he claims that civil unions are the legal equivalent to marriage. Unfortunately, that is not the case. Social security and survivor benefits, tax laws, inheritance laws -- all of these protect those who are legally married but not civilly united. Shooting for marriage makes it sound like same-sex couples want the right to faster checkout lines or parking privileges. Why not shoot for marriage? Who does that hurt? What does any heterosexual married couple lose if same-sex couples can get married? Is there one thing they would lose? If so, what is it? (And please don't forget that the Catholic Church did routinely perform same-sex marriages during the middle ages -- so tradition is just not a valid argument to support a ban on gay marriage.)report abuse
Brian Kaufman of Farmington, ME
Feb 27, 2007 2:46 PM
Any business owners who believe that training an interim replacement costs more than retaining an unhappy employee struggling to meet the demands of urgent family care, they ought to brush up on some industrial psychology. Dissatisfied workers can cost you far more than training interim replacements. Loyalty and respect beget loyalty and respect.

Maine is smart to lead the way in providing for family leave for unmarried partners. Though our personnel benefits and tax policies are meant to be benefits and protections for valued employees and citizens alike, marriage rates are at their lowest point ever in this country. Family units defined by mutual caring are no longer bound by traditional marriage, and only the wealthy are able to afford reliable daycare for children or elderly parents.

If Maine wants to attract talented workers and successful business opportunities, we have to provide respectful concern for all employees or they can easily choose to work elsewhere. report abuse
Jim of Gray, ME
Feb 27, 2007 2:31 PM
Jennifer, I agree that there is a problem in that Gay and Lesbians can't have a civil union which would act similar to marriage as far as legal rights go. But they are not asking for civil unions, they are shooting for marriage. They are similar not the same.....just as a gay couple is similar to a straight couple but not the same. report abuse

previous page | next page

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.