Wednesday, February 14, 2007
from the Kennebec Journal
Many students absent, but most not due to H1N1
Massacre could have been much worse
Nation's jobless rate reaches 10 percent
Attack 'outrageous,' says Augusta soldier stationed at Fort Hood
Old Man Winter: He's still got it
AUGUSTA Up the rails
Mace seeks repeat
Bobcats see similar team in title game
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Kennebec Journal
from the Morning Sentinel
'The luckiest man in the world just left us'
Officials: Swine flu a small part of school absences
Veteran: Military 'gives you strength'
AFTER THE VOTE How to dispense pot to patients?
SUSPECT FOUND IN CLOSET
NEWPORT Police recover two firearms
State cross country titles up for grabs
H.S. GIRLS SOCCER Raiders try to crack West's title reign
All of today's:
News | Sports
from the Morning Sentinel
Watts wants the Bureau of Environmental Protection to modify permits held by the owners of four dams in order to require immediate fish passage along stretches of the Kennebec River through central Maine.
The state-issued permits are illegal with the current language, and current practices threaten the American eel, American shad, blueback herring, alewife and Atlantic salmon by limiting their movements through the Kennebec River, according to Watts.
"They (signatories of the agreement) made a mistake, and it needs to be fixed," he said.
But at least one environmental group is saying that the current arrangement is the best possible compromise.
The Natural Resources Council of Maine is pushing for the arrangement to stand.
"Look at what the original agreement has brought us. It brought the removal of the Edwards Dam, fish passage at the Benton Dam and the Burnham Dam, fish passage at the Lockwood Dam," Council staff scientist Nick Bennett said. "These are all very positive things that we don't think would have happened without the agreement."
Dams at issue are the Lockwood Hydro Project in Waterville and Winslow; the Shawmut Hydro Project in Fairfield, Benton and Clinton; and the Weston Hydro Project in Skowhegan, Norridgewock, Starks and Madison.
Various environmental groups, dam owners and individuals will present their positions on the matter at 9 a.m., Thursday, March 15 at the Calumet Club in Augusta. Watts said the BEP will hear testimony, examine evidence and render a verdict within a month or so. The hearing comes in response to petitions filed by Watts and Friends of Merrymeeting Bay. Watts, who in the past has worked with Friends of the Kennebec Salmon and Friends of Merrymeeting Bay, said he filed his petition as an individual. Friends of Merrymeeting Bay filed a separate petition.
Watts said he might consider some sort of compromise.
However, he said, "if it's just 'You guys are wrong, we disagree, we're going to keep everything the same,' I'm going to just go to Kennebec County Superior Court."
Joel Elliott -- 861-9252
jelliott@centralmaine.com

Reader comments
Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First
Is not that a rather narrow-minded view?
Leave people alone? Who exactly are you talking about? We're talking about companies that make oodles of money. They can afford, and should put in fish passage.
This is not a matter of simply protecting eels; we're talking about protecting an eco-system.
As someone who has been a supporter of the Natural Resources Council of Maine, I am sorry that this is the position they are taking.
I respect people like Doug Watts who will stand up for what is right. I wish others would do the same.
report abuse
You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.