Nutting: Cut fat before schools
By SUSAN M. COVER
Staff Writer
Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel Wednesday, February 14, 2007

AUGUSTA -- Sen. John Nutting thinks the Baldacci administration should cut state bureaucracy before asking schools to cut administrative costs.

"To me, they have not done enough," said Nutting, a Leeds Democrat and farmer who's served 12 years in the Legislature.

So Nutting has introduced a measure requiring state government administration to be cut by $30 million.

The bill, which has yet to be released from the Legislature's bill writing office, reflects some of the frustration from citizens since the governor announced his proposal to reduce the number of school districts from 290 to 26. Some of those who spoke at last week's public hearing on the proposal said the state should lead by example and cut its spending first.

But Gov. John Baldacci's chief financial officer said the state has made cuts in recent years, and challenged Nutting's assertion that there's room to slash another $30 million in administrative costs.

Rebecca Wyke, commissioner of the state Department of Administrative and Financial Services, said the governor has cut $11 million in administrative costs and proposes more in the current budget.

"What we're asking schools to do is nothing we haven't done here ourselves," she said.

Last year, the state centralized information technology, human resources, payroll, accounting and financial services to save $11 million, Wyke said. The state also merged two departments to create the Department of Health and Human Services and is proposing to merge two others to eliminate another commissioner position, she said.

In testimony to support the governor's school administration consolidation proposal, Wyke listed other cuts in the current budget. One cabinet-level position is being cut, eight other high level state jobs are being cut to save $1.6 million, and 57 other state positions are being eliminated.

Wyke said the state budget, now proposed to be $6.4 billion for the next two years, allocates 80 percent of its money to education and health care. The remaining 20 percent supports public safety, corrections, agriculture, conservation and all other state departments.

Those areas have faced cuts in recent years to support the state's commitment to K-12 education and increasing health care needs, she said.

"If we look at state government, we've basically been starving the 20 percent of the budget that's not health or education," she said.

Nutting's bill calls for a commission of business people, legislators and others to meet this summer to find ways to cut state government administration. The panel would then bring its recommendations forward for the 2008 legislative session.

Nutting also said he wants the state Office of Program Evaluation and Government Accountability -- which studies the effectiveness of state programs -- to work with the commission.

Alan Caron, president of GrowSmart Maine, said a study it commissioned from Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C., shows there's $60 million to $100 million that can be cut from state government, mostly in administrative duplication.

The report found that, while towns tend to be fairly frugal, schools and the state need to find ways to save money.

"The governor has teed up the school conversation," Caron said, "now we need to have a conversation about state government itself."

Part of Nutting's concern stems from his skepticism about the July 2008 deadline in Baldacci's school plan. He said other states, such as Vermont and New York, took two years to implement similar types of consolidation. But lawmakers would need to come up with a plan for administrative cuts by mid-March to be part of the state's two-year budget.

"I'm going to vote for school administrative savings," Nutting said. "But I'm not going to do it in a five-week period."

Wyke said she'd be happy to further discuss the cost of state government. But she feels any additional cuts would require a reduction in services.

"I'd be surprised if you could find $30 million in savings without severely impacting programs," she said.

Susan Cover -- 623-1056

scover@centralmaine.com


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

previous page | next page1-10 of 12 comments:

Skeptic of Dedham, ME
Feb 14, 2007 1:26 PM
Amen, SG needs to go. I would get rid of some of the other cronies at the same time. Cut the fat.report abuse
ItsMaine of Winthrop, ME
Feb 14, 2007 1:17 PM
Skeptic;
I am totally against the extreme downsizing of Education and get rid of Dirigo as you earlier mentioned. However, business knowledge transfer takes time when it comes to medical insurance. And as we all know time is money. I am not one who will be impacted by outsourcing but I do understand there is more than just the initial cost involved. What about the additional millions per year the state will have to pay to the outsourcer to process the $1.5 billion it pays out in Medicaid claims to providers each year. That new company isn't going to do it for free. Even if the company receives only 2% of the $1.5 billion it still adds up to a lot when the state can spend the $10 million and get the current system fully functional. Look at the states of Washington and Michigan who have just contracted with the developer who created the Maine provider payment system. They know they cannot create it for 25-50 million. Those two states are paying an even greater amount.
report abuse
Joe Public of Augusta, ME
Feb 14, 2007 12:44 PM
They can start by firing the inept Commissioner of Education.report abuse
Skeptic of Dedham, ME
Feb 14, 2007 12:38 PM
Gee, ItsMaine, sounds like you might be impacted by outsourcing. I am sorry, but what about the 650 teachers Mr 38% wants to eliminate? And for the record, I would like more details behind the 70 million it would cost to outsource. Is that the operating cost? Is that the cost of redeveloping a failed system? Whattime frame does that cover? The state should not be in the IT business, they are totally inept. I do not think you are giving us an apples to apples comparison.report abuse
MEn8ive of Wiscasset, ME
Feb 14, 2007 10:31 AM
Oh no! Not a reduction in services. Does that mean some cronies will have to get a real job? Wait, I forgot, They can just go on welfare. Then we will hire more service people to meet the "NEEDS". And on and on it goes.report abuse
ItsMaine of Winthrop, ME
Feb 14, 2007 9:50 AM
Dear Skeptic;
It's not the Medicare (Federal) payment system that is in trouble it's the Medicaid (State) payment system to providers that is having issues. State IT staff are trying to scurry and correct a problem that wasn't 100% their fault. Try looking at the Feds who pushed and pushed the State to implement the new payment system threating to cut funding if they didn't. So what do you get? A payment system that wasn't up to par at start and now a payment system the is getting better but not there yet. So, the state will look at spending another $70 million to outsource the payment system. Spend another $10 million to fix or $70 million to oursource and layoff 100 employees.report abuse
Bill Randall of Winthrop, ME
Feb 14, 2007 8:16 AM
tam201, please reread my comment. It was not my intent to be critical of the wardens; only the fish and wildlife managers - so called.

As you know, IF&W is the only state agency that is funded almost wholly by license fees, permits, etc. because of a unique Constitutional Amendment that amounts to protectionism. And of course, they also get huge stipends from the Feds such as the $2.6 million to study whether or not we have a breeding population of lynx. I wish you were at my side looking at the large book they gave me and what these incredibly wasteful wildlife managers - so called - spend our money on.

According to IF&W's Rick Record, just the administrative cost alone to issue a license or a permit is in excess of $5.

Surely we can find a better adminstrative and less costly way to tax the people for services rendered.

And advocating for the merging of the two agencies under the Department of Conservation was not my idea. It was just an idea that I think merits further discussion.

And yes, I know many state workers at IF&W like you who are diligent but I also know many of them who are not. They are friends and/or longstanding acquaintances and it would be inappropriate of me to point them out.report abuse
Anne VD of Waterville, ME
Feb 14, 2007 8:09 AM
I disagree with Rebecca Wyke, commissioner of the state Department of Administrative and Financial Services. I think that the state can find an additional $30 million in cuts.

I think that the state should begin by cutting health insurance for state retirees. Currently, the state pays health insurance premiums for its retirees in full. The state also pays 45% of health insurance premiums for retired teachers.

While paying health insurance premiums for state retirees is a wonderful concept, the state cannot afford to continue doing so. We are a poor state. In addition, paying health insurance for state retirees is an insult to Maine citizens struggling to pay for their own health insurance premiums. What makes retirees of the public sector any less deserving of this benefit. Until the state can afford to pay health insurance premiums to all retirees in the state of Maine, the state should cease offering this benefit to government employees and teachers.

The state should grandfather the benefit to existing state retirees and apologize to the remainder of the state employees/teachers. I know this would result in angering two of the largest unions in the state. After looking at the governor's school consolidation proposal, he's apparently not worried about angering anyone.

It's time for state government not only to talk the talk but walk the walk. It's time for tough choices.
report abuse
MikeH of Litchfield, ME
Feb 14, 2007 8:00 AM
Every State agency has waste problems, some worse then others. Cutting at the State agency level doesn't really do much for property taxes, which is why the school system is a target for cutting, and rightfully so. How about implementing a tuition based school system where the user pays and the user makes the decisions regarding the fate of the school? It works in other parts of the country. Why should an elderly couple who have spent their lives saving for retirement and built a beautiful home together be forced to pay all kinds of money for the local school system when you have some other couple with no money, 6 kids and a dumpy trailer paying next to nothing? It is simply unfair.report abuse
Skeptic of Dedham, ME
Feb 14, 2007 7:43 AM
How about nuking Dirigo Health, redundant police departments and Susan Gendron........

How about looking at the Medicare payment system that is 30 million over budget (originally 22 million). Let's get someone in charge of the IT systems that knows what they are doing. The state obviously is not up to the challenge.

There are so many places to cut and become more efficient while not losing vital services.report abuse

previous page | next page

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.