Critics take turns blasting Baldacci plan
By ELBERT AULL
MaineToday Media, Inc.
Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel Thursday, January 25, 2007

LEWISTON -- Gov. John Baldacci took his sweeping plan to consolidate school districts on the road Wednesday night and landed square in the bull's-eye.

Baldacci and state education commissioner Susan Gendron took heat for nearly two hours from skeptical teachers, school board members and parents. They lambasted his idea to reduce the number of school districts statewide from 290 to 26 by next year, calling it too extreme, too soon.

"Eighteen months is not enough time, and 26 school systems is too few," said Jim Morse, superintendent of School Administrative District 47 in Oakland.

Wednesday's forum at Lewiston Middle School was the first in a series of town-hall style meetings across Maine that Baldacci and Gendron plan to use to sell their idea to eliminate administrative positions across the state. The proposal, which primarily targets superintendents and their office staffs, is being presented as a cost-cutting move designed to address widespread anger about the state's tax burden.

Gendron said before the meeting that loss of local control has been a chief fear among skeptics. She was proven correct during a lengthy question-and-answer session as more than a dozen educators and school board members, mostly from central Maine, criticized the consolidation plan.

Their comments, and the tone of their questions, indicated they were almost uniformly opposed to the plan.

Educators questioned the effectiveness of the local advisory councils included in the proposal. Those panels would act as intermediaries between parents and principals and their regional board of directors.

"They don't have any control or authority," said Mark Hatch, principal of Messalonskee Middle School in Oakland.

Educators questioned the amount of savings -- roughly $250 million over three years -- claimed by Baldacci.

Baldacci and Gendron said the savings estimates are conservative, based on similar realignments recently instituted in New Jersey and New York.

One of the harshest critics of the plan was James Handy, a former legislator and current Lewiston School Committee member.

Handy, holding a laptop in the palm of one hand and gesturing with another, asked why Baldacci didn't provide details of the proposed consolidation during his re-election campaign last year. He questioned why some of the savings under the proposal would be redirected to the school laptop program, acknowledging the humor in his reading the questions off the screen of his laptop.

"This will either be your legacy, or the albatross around the neck of all of us," said Handy, who pressed Baldacci for more than 10 minutes and had to be cut off by other audience members.

Baldacci said the proposed increase in laptop funding is a separate item in his budget request that could be amended. He said he was clear about his support for consolidation of some sort in debates that led up to November's election, noting the idea was tossed around by groups that opposed the Taxpayer Bill of Rights initiative. Baldacci repeatedly stressed to a hostile crowd the need to do something about the state spending issue that triggered the TABOR initiative.

"Studies? Gotta get away from studies. Gotta get away from delays. ... Our people are demanding action," he said.

The Lewiston meeting took place in the district of state Sen. Peggy Rotundo, D-Lewiston, who backs one of a handful of competing consolidation measures to be considered this legislative session.

Rotundo, who introduced Baldacci, announced a separate public forum on her proposal, which would reduce the number of districts to 65. Her plan would establish 65 districts that would serve 3,000-4,000 students each, and save approximately $82 million over five years.

She said the State Education Board brought the report that led to her bill to educators, who recommended the 65 districts.

"There's been public input," Rotundo said.

The forum on Rotundo's proposal is scheduled for 7 p.m. Feb. 6 at Lewiston Middle School.


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest First | Newest first

Oldguy of Biddeford, ME
Jan 25, 2007 7:23 AM
Here's a novel idea. Lift most state mandates on education except for those required by Federal Law. Return full control of educational decisions to local communities. Cut state funding to local school districts except for a block grant based on the number of students.
What would this accomplish? It would get the state out of the education business which would cut the majority of one of the largest state departments.
It would allow local school districts to compete. This would almost ensure educational quality gets better. It would give full decision making ability to local communities. It would also give responsibility to towns and cities for their school funding.
Special education and other federal mandates could be funded differently, some of them out of social service budgets.
This is just a wild thought but I believe it could work. After all it did in Maine for much of our history until the big government people took over.report abuse
sr of Augusta, ME
Jan 25, 2007 7:48 AM
Thank You Gov Baldacci. I takes courage to cut out the fat in government. It's hard to cut jobs but its the right thing to do. Lets pray he gets the backing he needs.report abuse
dedeye of Pittston, ME
Jan 25, 2007 7:50 AM
As long as their are more people spending money (Maine government) then are making it (Maine taxpayers) their will never be enough money!
I would suggest Baldacci do more to reduce the size of the government and the intrusive way they do business.
I wonder how much money he is willing to spend on his redistricting plan?report abuse
Young_Guy of Augusta, ME
Jan 25, 2007 8:31 AM
Oldguy, your proposal may work in the major population centers of the state such as Biddeford but does not consider Eustis with a population of 863 (made that number up). Children living in Eustis deserve the some quality education as those living in Biddeford, Portland, Augusta, etc.

Competition is good when it can work effectively. The most expensive children to educate ate the special needs kids. Not the brown hair, blue eyed, straight A students. But the child that comes to school with difficult circumstances, reads a little slower, learns differently then most of his peers, etc. In competition what district would take on those kids? That is why the private schools have such high test scores; they attract and educate the cream of the crop and then boast at how good they are.

The fundamental problem is that taxes are too high for all of us. We have got to find ideas, methods, and solutions to reduce spending. Of course school board members and superintends are going to squawk. They would be loosing their power and kingdoms. They are a prime example of Parkinson’s Laws.

Look at some of the larger statewide companies. Dead River, Irving, Hannaford to name a few. They have local administrators (store managers or Principals) reporting to regional vice presidents (Superintends) who report to headquarters (Dept of Education).

The plan may not be the best, but what are the alternatives? To save money cut all of the addition programs like Band, Art, and Sports. This is a bad idea, actually a really bad idea. If we did that then we would need to start charging for these things (e.g. sports) where the kids that need it the most can't pay for it and don't participate?

Bottom line, the solution is simple; we have got to cut costs which translate to taxes. The question is where to cut. Do we cut in direct costs that impact the kids or do we cut the bureaucratic overhead? Choice seems like a no brainer to me.

My two cents...
report abuse

Show all 12 comments

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.