Critics take turns blasting Baldacci plan
By ELBERT AULL
MaineToday Media, Inc.
Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel Thursday, January 25, 2007

LEWISTON -- Gov. John Baldacci took his sweeping plan to consolidate school districts on the road Wednesday night and landed square in the bull's-eye.

Baldacci and state education commissioner Susan Gendron took heat for nearly two hours from skeptical teachers, school board members and parents. They lambasted his idea to reduce the number of school districts statewide from 290 to 26 by next year, calling it too extreme, too soon.

"Eighteen months is not enough time, and 26 school systems is too few," said Jim Morse, superintendent of School Administrative District 47 in Oakland.

Wednesday's forum at Lewiston Middle School was the first in a series of town-hall style meetings across Maine that Baldacci and Gendron plan to use to sell their idea to eliminate administrative positions across the state. The proposal, which primarily targets superintendents and their office staffs, is being presented as a cost-cutting move designed to address widespread anger about the state's tax burden.

Gendron said before the meeting that loss of local control has been a chief fear among skeptics. She was proven correct during a lengthy question-and-answer session as more than a dozen educators and school board members, mostly from central Maine, criticized the consolidation plan.

Their comments, and the tone of their questions, indicated they were almost uniformly opposed to the plan.

Educators questioned the effectiveness of the local advisory councils included in the proposal. Those panels would act as intermediaries between parents and principals and their regional board of directors.

"They don't have any control or authority," said Mark Hatch, principal of Messalonskee Middle School in Oakland.

Educators questioned the amount of savings -- roughly $250 million over three years -- claimed by Baldacci.

Baldacci and Gendron said the savings estimates are conservative, based on similar realignments recently instituted in New Jersey and New York.

One of the harshest critics of the plan was James Handy, a former legislator and current Lewiston School Committee member.

Handy, holding a laptop in the palm of one hand and gesturing with another, asked why Baldacci didn't provide details of the proposed consolidation during his re-election campaign last year. He questioned why some of the savings under the proposal would be redirected to the school laptop program, acknowledging the humor in his reading the questions off the screen of his laptop.

"This will either be your legacy, or the albatross around the neck of all of us," said Handy, who pressed Baldacci for more than 10 minutes and had to be cut off by other audience members.

Baldacci said the proposed increase in laptop funding is a separate item in his budget request that could be amended. He said he was clear about his support for consolidation of some sort in debates that led up to November's election, noting the idea was tossed around by groups that opposed the Taxpayer Bill of Rights initiative. Baldacci repeatedly stressed to a hostile crowd the need to do something about the state spending issue that triggered the TABOR initiative.

"Studies? Gotta get away from studies. Gotta get away from delays. ... Our people are demanding action," he said.

The Lewiston meeting took place in the district of state Sen. Peggy Rotundo, D-Lewiston, who backs one of a handful of competing consolidation measures to be considered this legislative session.

Rotundo, who introduced Baldacci, announced a separate public forum on her proposal, which would reduce the number of districts to 65. Her plan would establish 65 districts that would serve 3,000-4,000 students each, and save approximately $82 million over five years.

She said the State Education Board brought the report that led to her bill to educators, who recommended the 65 districts.

"There's been public input," Rotundo said.

The forum on Rotundo's proposal is scheduled for 7 p.m. Feb. 6 at Lewiston Middle School.


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

previous page | next page1-10 of 12 comments:

Oldguy of Biddeford, ME
Jan 25, 2007 2:53 PM
I don't disagree with all the comments here. But let me ask what kind of product does WALMART offer? Products that are ready for the landfill within a year of purchase if so fortunate.
It is easy to cut costs by using slick marketing and imported products that are substandard in quality. It is also a good way to keep the demand for products strong.
The reason WALMART does well in addition to offering substandard products is convenience. People don't want to take the time to shop sales or look for more durable products. You folks are right, quality is not an asset in today's world. What does that say about today's lifestyle?
I agree that education needs a comprehensive overhaul. I will even go so far as to say the number of Superintendants could be reduced. However I think the Governor's plan is poorly conceived and results in too much top down government.
Allowing towns and cities to run their schools without interference would reduce costs. Reducing state funding to schools with the exception of special services would require towns to determine their own school budgets. It would also reduce the state budget and allow for tax cuts.
Look at what State control of education has done. Mandatory salaries for starting teachers at some 20% higher than offered in some districts. Laptop computers in every 7-12 for every student. Requirements like these increase costs not decrease them.
The taxes on my home have more than doubled since the late 1980's. A prime component is state regulation of education. You people want more of the same?report abuse
Young_Guy of Augusta, ME
Jan 25, 2007 2:24 PM
Oh yea, lets get rid of the volunteer State Board of Education. Page 205 of the budget bill has their expenditures at the huge some of $150,000. What a waste of money given that it is serving the entire state.

But lets still keep local control. The same line item in the City of Augusta's budget, that is for the Board of Education, is $123,511 for ONE city. What a wonderful use of funds. The city of Augusta is spending 82% of what the state does. Walmart has it all wrong, local control is the way to go!


http://www.cony-hs.augusta.k12.me.us/Budget/ExpensesProposed2007.htm

report abuse
Ryan McArthur of Augusta, ME
Jan 25, 2007 2:18 PM
Old guy, with all do respect, to a large degree local control really is an antiquated idea which does not work effectively any longer. One only needs to look at the most successful businesses and how they structure themselves. At Walmart, for example, the store manager has authority within prescribed limits; beyond those limits the issue need to be passed up the chain of command. This structure keeps the local entity from needing too much overhead aka costs. And we all know that Walmart is all about reducing costs; they have this structure for a reason. Local control is too expensive and not practical in today’s world.

By and large local control is a misnomer. There are many federal and state guidelines which control local issues and control the manner in which the local districts operate. Without such the small rural areas would be at a significant disadvantage. Without state controls it would be too tempting for a City Council or some other similar governing board to cut necessary funding and destroy local education.

Another misnomer is the amount of money spent by DOE for its administrative team (and no I do not work for the state or DOE). The DOE budget for personnel services is $13,629,339 for 176 employees. Of which 74.5 ($5,374,031) positions is paid for by the federal government; as state taxpayers we are only paying for 101 employees out of actual state dollars -- DOE is fairly lean. The balance of the money is given directly to the local school districts. By the way that is $1,416,826,846 for one year. Pretty expensive local control don’t ya think!!!

The real problem is the “not in my backyard syndrome”. Everyone wants to pay less in taxes, maintain the same services and programs, but don’t you dare touch my local neighborhood school and other neighborhood stuff!

Young guy

By the way this data is available at http://www.maine.gov/budget/fy0809budrec%20PDF%20Files/2008%20GF%20Part%20A%20Final%20Update.pdf on page 178 of the budget bill.
report abuse
Oldguy of Biddeford, ME
Jan 25, 2007 11:43 AM
Young Guy. You're right. That is why Eustis and other neighboring smaller towns would form school districts as they do now and have done for years.
No one is advocating a return to one room schools. However show me a state program that local areas can't run better and cheaper without state interference? Top down government is always more expensive. People want to control their dollars and the local way can be efficient if people get involved.
It used to be civic service was treated as an honor and a responsibility. Today too many people want to sit on the couch, let others do the work, and complain. If localities controlled their schools people would HAVE to get involved or take interest.
Baldacci's plan is borrowed from New Brunswick. Others supporting it want to create a school system similar to the urban areas far south of us. Why not look at something that worked well in Maine for generations. Us older folk went to schools that were controlled locally and most of us made out just fine.report abuse
Joe Public of Augusta, ME
Jan 25, 2007 11:33 AM
I think "Old Guy" has a really good idea. Let's get rid of the State Board of Education and save money there. It has been their poor job of recognizing what is really needed for district and student success which had led to so many state failures.

The Governor and Commissioner mentioned how redistricting has occurred in NJ. Having us beleive that NJ has rezoned all districts in the manner he has planned for Maine. This is another outright lie. More lies from our Governor!!! Call any school district in NJ and you'll find that no such thing is occurring!report abuse
Taxpayer of North Yarmouth, ME
Jan 25, 2007 11:06 AM
I love the fact that all the teacher's union people that elected this guy are now the ones squawking the loudest at the first decent thing he has tried to do since he has been in office. report abuse
207 of Manchester, ME
Jan 25, 2007 10:52 AM
Of course the plan was panned by that audience. The state superintendent's association has been meeting and making plans about how to deal with this. Then they sent propaganda out to school board members statewide, urging them to go to these meetings with the Governor and included "suggested" questions to ask Baldacci at these meetings. This whole process is being manipulated by the administrators who stand to lose their jobs. I believe the public is smarter than this, and I for one support this plan! Let's get rid of top-heavy administrative expenses. They are weighing all of our pockets down. Eliminating administrative expenses will lower the tax burden without compromising our children's education. And given the lack of accountability that presently exists in many school districts toward excellence in education, maybe we can get some really solid educational programs in place so more of our kids will be prepared for college and professional careers. And if Baldacci wanted to make this even better, we could have magnet schools in each school district!report abuse
Skeptic of Dedham, ME
Jan 25, 2007 8:35 AM
Mr 38% does not have a clue as usual. Let's look long and hard at all the agencies we have in state governement and justify their existence. If they are not needed, "Good Bye". I can think of many that should be eliminated and just imagine how much money could be saved.

Has anyone ever looked to see how much money has been taken from our highway funds to fund other departments?

What about the DIRIGO health fiasco? The computer systems that have run 100% over budget and still do not work.... $$$$$$$ millions......report abuse
Young_Guy of Augusta, ME
Jan 25, 2007 8:31 AM
Oldguy, your proposal may work in the major population centers of the state such as Biddeford but does not consider Eustis with a population of 863 (made that number up). Children living in Eustis deserve the some quality education as those living in Biddeford, Portland, Augusta, etc.

Competition is good when it can work effectively. The most expensive children to educate ate the special needs kids. Not the brown hair, blue eyed, straight A students. But the child that comes to school with difficult circumstances, reads a little slower, learns differently then most of his peers, etc. In competition what district would take on those kids? That is why the private schools have such high test scores; they attract and educate the cream of the crop and then boast at how good they are.

The fundamental problem is that taxes are too high for all of us. We have got to find ideas, methods, and solutions to reduce spending. Of course school board members and superintends are going to squawk. They would be loosing their power and kingdoms. They are a prime example of Parkinson’s Laws.

Look at some of the larger statewide companies. Dead River, Irving, Hannaford to name a few. They have local administrators (store managers or Principals) reporting to regional vice presidents (Superintends) who report to headquarters (Dept of Education).

The plan may not be the best, but what are the alternatives? To save money cut all of the addition programs like Band, Art, and Sports. This is a bad idea, actually a really bad idea. If we did that then we would need to start charging for these things (e.g. sports) where the kids that need it the most can't pay for it and don't participate?

Bottom line, the solution is simple; we have got to cut costs which translate to taxes. The question is where to cut. Do we cut in direct costs that impact the kids or do we cut the bureaucratic overhead? Choice seems like a no brainer to me.

My two cents...
report abuse
dedeye of Pittston, ME
Jan 25, 2007 7:50 AM
As long as their are more people spending money (Maine government) then are making it (Maine taxpayers) their will never be enough money!
I would suggest Baldacci do more to reduce the size of the government and the intrusive way they do business.
I wonder how much money he is willing to spend on his redistricting plan?report abuse

previous page | next page

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.