Log In | Register | Help
Kennebec Journal and Morning Sentinel Kennebec Journal Morning Sentinel
Critics take turns blasting Baldacci plan
By ELBERT AULL
Blethen Maine Newspapers
Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel Thursday, January 25, 2007

LEWISTON -- Gov. John Baldacci took his sweeping plan to consolidate school districts on the road Wednesday night and landed square in the bull's-eye.

Baldacci and state education commissioner Susan Gendron took heat for nearly two hours from skeptical teachers, school board members and parents. They lambasted his idea to reduce the number of school districts statewide from 290 to 26 by next year, calling it too extreme, too soon.

"Eighteen months is not enough time, and 26 school systems is too few," said Jim Morse, superintendent of School Administrative District 47 in Oakland.

Wednesday's forum at Lewiston Middle School was the first in a series of town-hall style meetings across Maine that Baldacci and Gendron plan to use to sell their idea to eliminate administrative positions across the state. The proposal, which primarily targets superintendents and their office staffs, is being presented as a cost-cutting move designed to address widespread anger about the state's tax burden.

Gendron said before the meeting that loss of local control has been a chief fear among skeptics. She was proven correct during a lengthy question-and-answer session as more than a dozen educators and school board members, mostly from central Maine, criticized the consolidation plan.

Their comments, and the tone of their questions, indicated they were almost uniformly opposed to the plan.

Educators questioned the effectiveness of the local advisory councils included in the proposal. Those panels would act as intermediaries between parents and principals and their regional board of directors.

"They don't have any control or authority," said Mark Hatch, principal of Messalonskee Middle School in Oakland.

Educators questioned the amount of savings -- roughly $250 million over three years -- claimed by Baldacci.

Baldacci and Gendron said the savings estimates are conservative, based on similar realignments recently instituted in New Jersey and New York.

One of the harshest critics of the plan was James Handy, a former legislator and current Lewiston School Committee member.

Handy, holding a laptop in the palm of one hand and gesturing with another, asked why Baldacci didn't provide details of the proposed consolidation during his re-election campaign last year. He questioned why some of the savings under the proposal would be redirected to the school laptop program, acknowledging the humor in his reading the questions off the screen of his laptop.

"This will either be your legacy, or the albatross around the neck of all of us," said Handy, who pressed Baldacci for more than 10 minutes and had to be cut off by other audience members.

Baldacci said the proposed increase in laptop funding is a separate item in his budget request that could be amended. He said he was clear about his support for consolidation of some sort in debates that led up to November's election, noting the idea was tossed around by groups that opposed the Taxpayer Bill of Rights initiative. Baldacci repeatedly stressed to a hostile crowd the need to do something about the state spending issue that triggered the TABOR initiative.

"Studies? Gotta get away from studies. Gotta get away from delays. ... Our people are demanding action," he said.

The Lewiston meeting took place in the district of state Sen. Peggy Rotundo, D-Lewiston, who backs one of a handful of competing consolidation measures to be considered this legislative session.

Rotundo, who introduced Baldacci, announced a separate public forum on her proposal, which would reduce the number of districts to 65. Her plan would establish 65 districts that would serve 3,000-4,000 students each, and save approximately $82 million over five years.

She said the State Education Board brought the report that led to her bill to educators, who recommended the 65 districts.

"There's been public input," Rotundo said.

The forum on Rotundo's proposal is scheduled for 7 p.m. Feb. 6 at Lewiston Middle School.


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

Oldguy of Biddeford, ME
Jan 25, 2007 2:53 PM
I don't disagree with all the comments here. But let me ask what kind of product does WALMART offer? Products that are ready for the landfill within a year of purchase if so fortunate.
It is easy to cut costs by using slick marketing and imported products that are substandard in quality. It is also a good way to keep the demand for products strong.
The reason WALMART does well in addition to offering substandard products is convenience. People don't want to take the time to shop sales or look for more durable products. You folks are right, quality is not an asset in today's world. What does that say about today's lifestyle?
I agree that education needs a comprehensive overhaul. I will even go so far as to say the number of Superintendants could be reduced. However I think the Governor's plan is poorly conceived and results in too much top down government.
Allowing towns and cities to run their schools without interference would reduce costs. Reducing state funding to schools with the exception of special services would require towns to determine their own school budgets. It would also reduce the state budget and allow for tax cuts.
Look at what State control of education has done. Mandatory salaries for starting teachers at some 20% higher than offered in some districts. Laptop computers in every 7-12 for every student. Requirements like these increase costs not decrease them.
The taxes on my home have more than doubled since the late 1980's. A prime component is state regulation of education. You people want more of the same?report abuse
Young_Guy of Augusta, ME
Jan 25, 2007 2:24 PM
Oh yea, lets get rid of the volunteer State Board of Education. Page 205 of the budget bill has their expenditures at the huge some of $150,000. What a waste of money given that it is serving the entire state.

But lets still keep local control. The same line item in the City of Augusta's budget, that is for the Board of Education, is $123,511 for ONE city. What a wonderful use of funds. The city of Augusta is spending 82% of what the state does. Walmart has it all wrong, local control is the way to go!


http://www.cony-hs.augusta.k12.me.us/Budget/ExpensesProposed2007.htm

report abuse
Ryan McArthur of Augusta, ME
Jan 25, 2007 2:18 PM
Old guy, with all do respect, to a large degree local control really is an antiquated idea which does not work effectively any longer. One only needs to look at the most successful businesses and how they structure themselves. At Walmart, for example, the store manager has authority within prescribed limits; beyond those limits the issue need to be passed up the chain of command. This structure keeps the local entity from needing too much overhead aka costs. And we all know that Walmart is all about reducing costs; they have this structure for a reason. Local control is too expensive and not practical in today’s world.

By and large local control is a misnomer. There are many federal and state guidelines which control local issues and control the manner in which the local districts operate. Without such the small rural areas would be at a significant disadvantage. Without state controls it would be too tempting for a City Council or some other similar governing board to cut necessary funding and destroy local education.

Another misnomer is the amount of money spent by DOE for its administrative team (and no I do not work for the state or DOE). The DOE budget for personnel services is $13,629,339 for 176 employees. Of which 74.5 ($5,374,031) positions is paid for by the federal government; as state taxpayers we are only paying for 101 employees out of actual state dollars -- DOE is fairly lean. The balance of the money is given directly to the local school districts. By the way that is $1,416,826,846 for one year. Pretty expensive local control don’t ya think!!!

The real problem is the “not in my backyard syndrome”. Everyone wants to pay less in taxes, maintain the same services and programs, but don’t you dare touch my local neighborhood school and other neighborhood stuff!

Young guy

By the way this data is available at http://www.maine.gov/budget/fy0809budrec%20PDF%20Files/2008%20GF%20Part%20A%20Final%20Update.pdf on page 178 of the budget bill.
report abuse
Oldguy of Biddeford, ME
Jan 25, 2007 11:43 AM
Young Guy. You're right. That is why Eustis and other neighboring smaller towns would form school districts as they do now and have done for years.
No one is advocating a return to one room schools. However show me a state program that local areas can't run better and cheaper without state interference? Top down government is always more expensive. People want to control their dollars and the local way can be efficient if people get involved.
It used to be civic service was treated as an honor and a responsibility. Today too many people want to sit on the couch, let others do the work, and complain. If localities controlled their schools people would HAVE to get involved or take interest.
Baldacci's plan is borrowed from New Brunswick. Others supporting it want to create a school system similar to the urban areas far south of us. Why not look at something that worked well in Maine for generations. Us older folk went to schools that were controlled locally and most of us made out just fine.report abuse

Show all 12 comments

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.