Billing system change possible
By SUSAN M. COVER
Staff Writer
Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel Friday, January 12, 2007

AUGUSTA -- Department of Health and Human Services Commissioner Brenda Harvey is considering whether to hire a vendor to take over the state's troubled Medicaid billing system.

In an interview Thursday, Harvey said she's meeting with three companies that routinely perform this type of billing for other states. More than 30 states hire fiscal agents to do the work, she said.

Hiring a vendor would result in the elimination of 100 jobs from the department.

"My goal is, less than a year from now, we will have a plan in place that has full federal support, and that I can divert my attention to the other issues of this department," said Harvey, who inherited the problems when she took over as commissioner in the spring of 2006.

More than a year earlier, in January 2005, the state switched to a new system to handle Medicaid claims from more than 7,000 service providers across the state. Those service providers include nonprofits and businesses that help the mentally ill, mentally retarded, former inmates, nursing home residents, and low-income children who need dental care.

The system did not function properly, leaving many providers without reimbursement checks, or with payments in the wrong amount. After several months, some closed their doors and others started to receive estimated payments to keep them afloat.

After an initial contract price of $22 million, the state has now spent more than $50 million on the system.

The system currently in place is working for most claims, Harvey said, but not all. Because the state hasn't been able to make all of the upgrades deemed necessary by the federal government, the system cannot be certified. Without certification, the state isn't eligible for money that could be used to help pay for development and implementation of the system.

The two-year budget proposed last week by Gov. John Baldacci allows the department to hire an outside company to handle the billing, and to move 100 positions from the state's billing department to other positions, Harvey said.

"It's premature to say we're scrapping (the system)," she said. "That's not where we are. It may be an outcome. I can't tell you it is or isn't.

"Even if we decide we would be going with an entirely different system, we continue paying claims in the interim."

Local service providers say they understand that a change may be necessary, but worry about going through yet another switchover.

"I certainly am very skeptical, from what I've seen so far, that the (current system) is going to be fixed," said Charlene Kinnelly, executive director of Uplift Inc. in Gardiner. "It just doesn't seem realistic."

At one point in 2005, the state owed Uplift, which provides services for the mentally ill and mentally retarded, $250,000 in back payments.

Kinnelly said the billing system is doing well now, though some changes to the system over the summer once again disrupted her payments.

"The concern, of course, is another switch," she said.

For Mark Tully, executive director of Community Correctional Alternatives in Waterville and Farmington, payments are coming in "fairly regularly."

As for the prospect of a new vendor handling payments, Tully said he just wants to make sure he can count on the money coming in on time.

"The only concern we would have is, would there be another problem with enrolling and having payment interruptions?" he said.

Harvey said avoiding those kinds of problems is one of the details she would work out with a potential vendor.

"We are very cognizant of the experience providers have had," she said. "We will do everything in our ability to mitigate any further challenge to them."

For lawmakers, it's time to do something different.

"I think we need to do something serious," said Sen. Joseph Brannigan, D-Portland, chairman of the Health and Human Services Committee. "A serious change is in order to make this right."

Rep. Sarah Lewin, R-Eliot, a member of the committee, criticized the state's actions to date.

"I think it's a shame we wasted $50 million while we fiddled around with something we couldn't handle," she said.

Because of the problems with the payment system, some doctors decided to stop accepting Medicaid patients.

Lewin said her allergist is the only one in York County that continues to treat those on Medicaid, and the state owes that office $25,000.

"I have personal knowledge that the nonsense goes on," she said.

Susan Cover -- 623-1056

scover@centralmaine.com


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

1-9 of 9 comments:

whosmoney of augusta, ME
Jan 12, 2007 2:59 PM
I feel the pain of those that might have to find other work within the state structure or enter the work place out side the state employment structure.

What I do not under stand is where is the accountability for the software supplyer that has supplyed the software that does not work. Also where is the person or people that have not held the software supplyer to the contract that stated that they could do it for 22 million and has allowed this to grow to over 55 Million, more than double the oridgnal contract. This is a rip off of our tax monies. I personally know several state inployees that work in this department and the hours that they have put in over the past year since the system was put in is more than they should have to work in a week. Computers are supose to save us time, increase our productivity and be more acountable. What I see here is some one found a gold mine and they are squeezing all they can out of a state contract knowing they will not be held accountable for the mess they have created or jobs they have cost people. It is high time open ended contracts become a thing of the past and our state leaders and managers become more accountable to its citizens.report abuse
tam201 of lewiston, ME
Jan 12, 2007 2:25 PM
As a state worker myself, and no I do not work DHHS, I feel state workers will once again take a hit and loose jobs while upper management continues to claim they are saving taxpayers money, reducing state government spending. When in fact, they will not. If you put people on the unemployment line they will be forced to sign up for benefits they truely do not want to use. They spent "$50 million fiddling" to set up a system that they NOW want to outsource????? What happens to the $50 million they spent? Do we get that back since we won't use the system? Then you want to outsource the work to where??? Out of state to put NON tax paying citizens of this state to work while Maine state tax payers are out of work? As a tax payer this infuriates me. Give the people who have worked so hard a chance to FIX what went wrong and make it right. Another case of upper management making a hasty decision that didn't work and the worker bees having to work harder to try and fix it then pay the price for it. report abuse
IThink of Whitefield, ME
Jan 12, 2007 1:13 PM
Another quote from the article says "Hiring a vendor would result in the elimination of 100 jobs from the department." Which is correct? Who knows. If it is a State employee, no one cares about jobs lost, or having to take demotions because of job eliminations. It is just seen as reducing State government. Everyone wants to see fewer State employees, but everyone also wants more and better State services. Who do think provides those services? No one wants to wait in line at Motor Vehicle, but no one suggests hiring more State employees to assist the public. You can't have it both ways.

report abuse
4mykids of augusta, ME
Jan 12, 2007 1:03 PM
I work in claims and I feel that it is unfair to the people who work these claims and have really tried to get the providers what they deserve.
Maine care workers did not pick this system and have really worked hard to make it work. }
Most of the workers here are a paycheck away from being on maine care and out sourcing is not a very nice way to appreciate people who got claims down from over 500,000 to 70,000 this week.
we care about maine providers and maine care clients. from a concerned worker at OMS
claims. Ps I am a single parent who would like to continue to work to support my family. report abuse
Nan of Anytown, ME
Jan 12, 2007 12:02 PM
Regarding the feared loss of jobs, it doesn't look like this will not put 100 people into the unemployment lines. Here's a direct quote from the article:

"The two-year budget proposed last week by Gov. John Baldacci allows the department to hire an outside company to handle the billing, and to [b]move 100 positions from the state's billing department to other positions[/b], Harvey said."

Looks to me like they'll just get moved into openings elsewhere in the system. As huge as our state government is, I'm sure these folks can be redeployed.report abuse
IThink of Whitefield, ME
Jan 12, 2007 8:59 AM
Unfortunately the 100 positions that will be eliminated are people that most likely have nothing to do with the failure of the system. They are just workers asked to use a faulty system created for them. But they will be the ones out the door and the general public will think that there has been some cut in goverment spending because of it. Then we will find out that the third party company, probably from out of state, pays low wages and no benefits, and cost just as much to operate as the old system. And we will have 100 more Maine workers looking for jobs.report abuse
mya of waterville, ME
Jan 12, 2007 8:42 AM
I have been a private provider for services for Mainecare for the last 15 years. I have basically given away my services because I could never get reimburesed, which in my estimate comes close to $60K. I never did the switch because I wanted to if the system worked. HAHAHA.
I couldn't afford to lose anymore money, I have a family to raise.report abuse
Sue of Fairfield, ME
Jan 12, 2007 8:41 AM
I say scrap the current system, hire the vendor who is in the business of running these types of programs and get it right once and for all. Perhaps some of those that may not be able to transfer to a department within the system can be hired by the new vendor. If not, there are always other employment alternatives. I, for one, know there is life after getting laid off from a state job. And it is good.report abuse
Sue of Fairfield, ME
Jan 12, 2007 8:34 AM
I'd say it's time to stop throwing good money after bad and scrap the current system. Contracting a staff and providing them with a proven program to operate makes good long term financial sense. Too bad there will be a loss, but will it eventually be recouped with a smooth running system. The problems with the currrent system run so deep that I see no end in sight to the problems with it. Expensive lesson learned!report abuse

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.