SAD 16 blasts Baldacci's school plan
By MECHELE COOPER
Staff Writer
Kennebec Journal & Morning Sentinel Friday, January 12, 2007

HALLOWELL -- School Administrative District 16 officially opposes Gov. John Baldacci's plan to reduce the number of school districts in the state.

The SAD 16 Board of Directors drafted a letter Wednesday that calls his plan to reduce the number of Maine school districts from 152 to 26 a "top-down" plan pushed on Maine's educators without regard for their cost-cutting efforts.

The governor says his proposal would save $250 million over three years if it gets legislative approval.

According to the letter: "This is a top-down plan being pushed without any recognition of local wishes or of any steps individual districts, such as SAD 16, have made on their own to consolidate and improve administrative operating efficiencies."

SAD 16 board member Tom Austin said the governor's plan needs to be thought through more carefully, but that the SAD 16 board was afraid a review would not be allowed before legislators considered it as a budget item this year.

SAD 16 officials said the letter will be sent to Sen. Earle McCormick, R-West Gardiner, and Rep. Sharon Treat, D-Farmingdale, and possibly published in the media.

If the governor's proposal is approved, SAD 16 students would be in the same district as many other students in southern Kennebec County towns, including Augusta, Readfield, Winthrop and Chelsea, Austin said.

He said consolidating school activities is nothing new. The idea has been floating around for a while.

"We've had quite a bit of success with this," Austin said Thursday. "For example, we share a lot of the office services with Dresden, our office does all the accounting and reporting for both districts, and we share a special ed director with a number of districts.

"These are the things the governor seems to envision, but the plan is too drastic a move."

Board member Dan Shagoury worries SAD 16's cost-sharing -- such as buying oil cooperatively with the city of Hallowell, sharing services with municipalities and accepting tuition students from Dresden -- would be undone by the governor's plan.

"We've been working closely with Dresden. We have a contract with them for middle school and, now, high school students," Shagoury said. "Is that all going to be severed?"

Shagoury said he strongly believes the proposal for reorganizing the school system should be a separate bill, not buried in the state budget.

Treat said she agreed that such a major proposal should be presented to the Legislature in a separate piece of legislation that would include a public hearing and review, not tucked into a massive budget document.

"The governor has come forward with one approach," Treat said. "It deserves review and serious consideration, but is only one of several options the Legislature can and will be looking at.

The governor's plan was put together without consulting the Legislature, and with minimal involvement from local school boards and others who will be affected by it."

Austin said other options for cutting costs would be to have the state directly involved in certain aspects of school operations, such as joint purchasing of school materials or the consolidation of accounting services.

But school board members say even that presents difficulties.

"If they combine us with all of Kennebec County, how do you figure out which town pays what?" Austin said. "You're likely to have winners and losers. There's a whole bunch of questions like that that we haven't heard anybody address yet."

Mechele Cooper -- 623-3811, Ext. 408

mcooper@centralmaine.com


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

MikeH of Litchfield, ME
Jan 13, 2007 8:22 AM
Hello?? Don't you rememebr voting with your wallets in mind to have the State pay for 55% of our education costs? That gives the State control of the education decisions. Now that the State is acting on your votes everyone is upset? You should have seen this coming!
If we really want to reduce property taxes, we should switch to a tuition based school system like the southern states, users pay and have more influence locally on education decisions.report abuse
112tracy of buxton, ME
Jan 12, 2007 8:26 PM
my my, here we go again. Let's improve a system by cutting payroll.DUH! Where are the ever surmounting issues of how to improve education and give our graduates a reason to remain here in the state of Maine. Along with an effort to impliment a program without exhausting study,[like everything else], this seems like a drastic measure. The horse can only remain behind the wagon for so long before it realizes it is following a blind trail. Perhaps a good idea in the future, but lets address more important issues now. Thanks, Paulreport abuse
reader1 of Newport, ME
Jan 12, 2007 12:59 PM
I absolutely agree with Frank ... we need to move alot slower on this and think it through rather than make the change and have it fail. I am very surprised at how quickly the state wants to move on this. Why the rush? report abuse
Frank Heller of Brunswick, ME
Jan 12, 2007 10:13 AM
I listened carefully to Gendron's reply to Fred Bever's question about the background research done on this type of consolidation yesterday on MPR.

Her answer was a shocking revelation of no research into the many failed and some successful experiments into consolidation in the U.S.; and overwhelming reliance on the Canadian Provincial administration of public education.

Even a quick look at the organizational structure of the New Brunswick Department of Education and their way of totally paying for the operation of the schools in the nine districts, reveals a vast difference between Maine and New Brunswick's nearly socialized structure.

The province of New Brunswick totally controls nearly every aspect of education and running schools at the local level.

The districts range in size from Moncton with 16,508 students and 1,055 educators; down to Dalhousie with 3,982 students and 282 educators.
Overall enrollment in New Brunswick schools has dropped steadily over the past few decades to the current level of 120,600.

The consolidation actually began in 1967 with the elimination of counties and their replacement by the provincial government as the principal agent of local administration. Local school districts were consolidated and many functions incorporated into the Provincial department of government.

The Maine legislature would have to greatly increase the power of Gendron's department and abolish the many types of local school units--SAD
's, SAU's, CSAD's, and more importantly, school departments which are imbedded in Town Charters.

The other huge difference is that Maine's administration at the state and local level has changed dramatically with the acceptance of Federal funds in the late Sixties and up to NCLB and many other programs. There appears to be little federal presence in the education Dept. of the Province of New Brunswick.

This is a poorly thought out copycat initiative.
We can do much better than swing the AX!report abuse

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.