Welcome to kjonline.com's reader comments forum, which is offered as
a "public square" for our audience. We view this space as our readers'
section of the Web site, separate from our journalistic offerings.
We hope you will use the forum to advance public dialogue and community
discourse. As such, we ask that participants refrain from personal
attacks and offensive comments. If you believe a comment is inappropriate or
offensive, you can bring it to our attention by clicking on the 'report
abuse' link by the comment. It will be reviewed by online staff.
Please understand that 1) a comment is not "inappropriate" solely
because you disagree with its author; and 2) there may be a delay while
the comment is being reviewed.
Please review our Reader Comment Guidelines.

|
Comments about:
Consolidation won't work because costs are more than savings The paper's editorial of June 24, titled, "Consolidation Delay Doesn't Mean Do Nothing," indicates a profound... [ back to story ] |
|



Reader comments
Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First
The law relied almost solely on the number of students in a school system as the criterion for an acceptable consolidation plan. 200 students or 2,000 - there was no requirement that the central office staff be made smaller or paid less. So many weren't.
The law needs to be repealed. If consolidation of school systems really is a good and needed idea for Maine schools and students, then let's figure out a way to do it that's not detrimental to the very institutions it's trying to save.report abuse
I recommend that folks take some time to educate themselves about the scope of the law - which towns are and are not affected by the law. The web sites cited in the article are a good place to start.report abuse
You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.