Welcome to kjonline.com's reader comments forum, which is offered as
a "public square" for our audience. We view this space as our readers'
section of the Web site, separate from our journalistic offerings.
We hope you will use the forum to advance public dialogue and community
discourse. As such, we ask that participants refrain from personal
attacks and offensive comments. If you believe a comment is inappropriate or
offensive, you can bring it to our attention by clicking on the 'report
abuse' link by the comment. It will be reviewed by online staff.
Please understand that 1) a comment is not "inappropriate" solely
because you disagree with its author; and 2) there may be a delay while
the comment is being reviewed.
Please review our Reader Comment Guidelines.

|
Comments about:
We need voting system for 21st century City and state voting officials are girding for a big turnout on Nov. 4, Election Day. Secretary of State Matthew... |
|



Reader comments
Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First
How do they expect to win an election anyway? They got beat by what they call "the worst president ever" twice. Now they're campaigning against him again and he's not even on the ballotreport abuse
First, the objection to a plurality system is misguided. The Founding Founders gave us a Constitutional Republic, not a majority-rule Democracy, because they knew pure majority rule often leads to tyranny.
Second, IRV doesn't solve this imagined "flaw" anyway, it merely creates the illusion of a majority (and a false mandate). Once 2nd & 3rd choices are tallied (because nobody got 50% + 1 of first choices) the winner has only an artificially fabricated majority.
Third, IRV fails to ensure an accurate measure of voter intent because some voters have secondary choices counted while others do not, AND, voters cast votes NOT knowing who the runoff candidates will be or how their votes will be affected by other voters. Thus, any claims of a true majority victory have to be considered false and misleading.
We believe a plurality system better reflects the will of the voters than the "fabricated" majority likely created by IRV. This is NOT to say we prefer representatives who agree with only a minority of voters; merely that a plurality winner is perfectly acceptable in a three-way (or more) election, especially in a representative republican form of government.
Food for thought - Ironically, IRV doesn't even guarantee a majority will be elected! If no majority is produced after all rankings are tallied, the one with the most votes is declared the winner!
Please visit our website for a much clearer understanding of IRV and our legal challenge against it.
Thank you,
Andy Cilek
Minnesota Voters Alliance
www.MNVoters.orgreport abuse
You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.