Welcome to kjonline.com's reader comments forum, which is offered as
a "public square" for our audience. We view this space as our readers'
section of the Web site, separate from our journalistic offerings.
We hope you will use the forum to advance public dialogue and community
discourse. As such, we ask that participants refrain from personal
attacks and offensive comments. If you believe a comment is inappropriate or
offensive, you can bring it to our attention by clicking on the 'report
abuse' link by the comment. It will be reviewed by online staff.
Please understand that 1) a comment is not "inappropriate" solely
because you disagree with its author; and 2) there may be a delay while
the comment is being reviewed.
Please review our Reader Comment Guidelines.

|
Comments about:
Beverage-tax foes outraise proponents AUGUSTA -- The proponents of an effort to repeal a new tax on beer, wine and soda grew their cash advantage... |
|



Reader comments
Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First
"Under the law, the Dirigo program would derive its funding from those taxes(beverage tax)and a fee collected on insurance claims."
Just who do you think will be paying that "fee".
Would it be those of us already paying for our health care? Why yes of course but that is a "fee" and not a tax.
Now isn't the idea here to punish those of us who indulge ourselves on beer, wine, and carbonated drinks because of the health problems those products subject us to? Is the Maine Legislature also punishing those of us who pay for our own health care because that too is also somehow harmful to us?
The beverage lobby did not have to help me with my signature that day at the voting booth.report abuse
It's a targeted tax. Targeted at everything but milk, pure fruit juice, water, and micro brewed beer. What? Isn't this a tax on beer and wine? Only the big brewers and vinters. It's not across the board and it's sure as heck not above board.
If our legislature really, truly believes in Dirigo (when did we go from 14,000 participants to 50,000?) then there would be a more comprehensive, less hinky way to finance it. Public programs for the general population should be funded across the board by the general population.
We'll not even begin to talk about our very good not-for-profit health insurer located in this state till a few years back when our legislature decided it was in our best interests to sell it to anthem.report abuse
Watch for TABOR II my friend. We were stupid. We really believed it when the legislators promised us no new taxes. Man, were we duped. Not again bro.....report abuse
Show all 21 comments
You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.