Welcome to kjonline.com's reader comments forum, which is offered as
a "public square" for our audience. We view this space as our readers'
section of the Web site, separate from our journalistic offerings.
We hope you will use the forum to advance public dialogue and community
discourse. As such, we ask that participants refrain from personal
attacks and offensive comments. If you believe a comment is inappropriate or
offensive, you can bring it to our attention by clicking on the 'report
abuse' link by the comment. It will be reviewed by online staff.
Please understand that 1) a comment is not "inappropriate" solely
because you disagree with its author; and 2) there may be a delay while
the comment is being reviewed.
Please review our Reader Comment Guidelines.

|
Comments about:
LURC should pare Plum Creek plan for good of Maine The prolonged battle over Plum Creek's development plans for the Moosehead Lake region has taken place on two... [ back to story ] |
|



Reader comments
Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First
The decision is with LURC now, so unless the LURC board members allow themselves to be improperly influenced by outside comments (they won't), all of this blog discussion is simply "ignorant armies clashing in the night".report abuse
So while everyday Montanans pay the taxes that fund education for our kids, paving our roads and keeping our towns safe, Plum Creek lawyers and accountants are busy hide piles of cash in an elaborate shell game supported by their friends in the legislature. President and CEO of Plum Creek Timber, Rick Holley, has stated, "Our standards, integrity, and reputation will not be compromised." Well, Mr. Holley, they have been compromised and it's about time that the Legislature of the State of Montana holds you responsible.
You're drinking the kool-aid if you think PC is interested in helping Maine.report abuse
Timber companies got the lands for timber use. The prices these lands sell for and the highly favorable tax treatment they receive reflect they are to be used for tree growth and harvest.
Four hundred miles away, things have changed on Wall Street and shareholders demand higher returns, and this is why we read that the timber companies need to go into the development business.
But sorry, the land is zoned for tree growth which provides jobs in the woods and mills. And there has always been a pact that in return for the favorable property taxes, the people have pretty much open access.
The Plum Creek supporters and their PR agencies like to cast opponents as whacko environmentalists. Well, in fact, the idea of turning serene Maine woods icon Moosehead Lake into South Lake Tahoe is what's whacko.
It's good that this has happenned because now the state will hopefully be jolted into action to create a comprehensive plan for the state's greatest heritage, the Maine Woods.
Clearly timber companies cannot be allowed to develop any more lakeshores or other areas that are the heart of the north woods character. On the other hand, a comprehensive plan should allow these companies to create limited developments, including reasonably scaled resorts and housing next tp places where it exists.
Maine stoood its ground with Cabela's and the sporting goods leviathan backed down. The same will happen with Plum Creek facing the reality of the coming comprehensive plan.report abuse
Show all 10 comments
You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.