Comments about: Falsehoods in attack on Collins' Senate record
The start of the election year has brought a barrage of falsehoods about Sen. Susan Collins' record.

The assertion...
[ back to story ]

Bookmark & share: digg del.icio.us Reddit

Welcome to kjonline.com's reader comments forum, which is offered as a "public square" for our audience. We view this space as our readers' section of the Web site, separate from our journalistic offerings. We hope you will use the forum to advance public dialogue and community discourse. As such, we ask that participants refrain from personal attacks and offensive comments. If you believe a comment is inappropriate or offensive, you can bring it to our attention by clicking on the 'report abuse' link by the comment. It will be reviewed by online staff. Please understand that 1) a comment is not "inappropriate" solely because you disagree with its author; and 2) there may be a delay while the comment is being reviewed. Please review our Reader Comment Guidelines.


Reader comments

Sort by: Oldest first | Newest First

B Priddy of N/A, ME
Feb 3, 2008 2:46 PM
Susan Collins has a strong and proven track record regarding her bi-partisan leadership on oversight and investigations.

I quite honestly cannot even believe that anyone would say otherwise or challenge her on this issue!report abuse
Carl Lindemann of Portland, ME
Jan 29, 2008 7:33 AM
Ms. Burita has a lot of nerve complaining about smear tactics after the actions carried out most recently by the Collins Campaign's Director of Internet Strategy. Worse, Collins may well owe her job to a smear from her first campaign for the Senate that resulted in a libel suit. That matter was settled out of court when then Sen. Collins was going to have to testify under oath about how she set it in motion personally - despite making statements to the press denying any involvement.

Check the story of the smear that Collins personally launched here:
http://www.brightberrypress.com/CollinsIntro.htm

Is Collins using smear tactics in the current campaign working with Far Right activists connected to the Heritage Foundation? Check "All the Senator's Men?" an investigative study:
http://www.truedialog.org/news.htmlreport abuse
jm of Augusta, ME
Jan 28, 2008 3:56 PM
Jonathan:

You hit the nail right on the head when it comes to Collins' record of votes. When the chips were down, and Collins's vote was needed to support Bush, she supported the party line. Sometimes when her vote wasn't crucial, she was allowed to vote with the opposition so she could claim to be "moderate" or "independent."

Her votes to enable the continuing war in Iraq, to stick Roberts and Alito on the Supreme Court, to grant immunity to the telecoms for their part in Bush's warrantless surveillance program (thus ensuring that we will not learn the truth about Bush's crimes in court), and her backing of both Gonzalez and Mukasey for Attorney General show Collins' true colors. The idea that she would seriously try to hold Halliburton or Custer Battles accountably for waste and fraud in Iraq is laughable.report abuse
Jonathan Albrecht of Dixfield, ME
Jan 28, 2008 11:00 AM
cpanner,

You can't camoflage Collins' many failures of leadership by wrapping her in Snowe's mantle. Snowe has voted, spoken, and lead in opposition to the worst excesses of the Bush Administration. Collins has done nothing of the kind. Compare their voting records. Snowe's is conservative but not tailored to the administration. Collins is the representative from NFIB with a string of years of 100% pro-Bush voting records.
Snow'e is a profound political thinker with independent views. Collin's is Maine's answer to Senator Scott of Pennsylvania who if his party needed his vote, he gave it. If they didn't, he'd vote the popular will consulting the polls on a daily basis.report abuse

Show all 11 comments

You must be a registered user of MaineToday.com to post a comment. Register or log in.